Muslim Migrant TikToker Threatens UK Pol, Films Himself Getting Admitted Into the Country

He has a Kalashnikov tattooed on his face, and he threatened to kill a British politician, and so of course Mada Pasa, a Muslim migrant from Afghanistan, was just admitted into Britain. Was his admission into the country ever in doubt? Yes, he was detained, but what are the odds that leftist British authorities, who have been trained for years to see no jihad threat even when it is right in front of their faces, will actually deport him? Terrorist murderers are walking around free in Britain; why shouldn’t Mada Pasa?

The Daily Mail reported Friday that Pasa “has racked up millions of views on TikTok documenting his attempts to make it to the UK,” and now he has made it at last: he is “finally on British soil after his latest video showed him crossing the English Channel in a small boat.”

This is so despite the fact that Pasa “provoked fury with his online videos in which he pretends to fire a gun and ‘vlogs’ his efforts to illegally reach Britain from northern France.” In another video, Pasa “took aim” at British politician Nigel Farage, architect of the Brexit vote. This was because Farage, who is now an MP for Reform UK, had noticed Pasa before, and stated on X: “The guys name is Mada Pasa, he has been living in Stockholm, he clearly wants to be a big star on TikTok, he wants to become an influencer. Perhaps he thinks his chances are better coming to the United Kingdom and doing it here.”

Pasa was furious, and replied in another video: “English man Nigel (Pasa). Don’t talk s**t about me. You not know me. I come to England because I want to be married with your sister. Don’t talk about me more. Delete the video. It is not good my friend, you do not know me. I am going to come to England…” The Mail adds that Pasa “then proceeded to make a gesture with his hand like a gun and says ‘pop, pop, pop,’ before headbutting the camera three times and aiming the gun tattoo on his cheek at the camera.”

When Pasa entered the country, Farage commented: “Mada Pasa, the migrant who has threatened to kill me, has now crossed the English Channel according to this video. Is this the kind of man we really want in Britain?”

Of course not, but aside from personal pique, it’s hard to see what Mada Pasa would have against Nigel Farage. Farage is weak and spineless, and doesn’t dare go near the issue of Islamic supremacism and the spread of Sharia in Britain. Yet even as squishy and revolting as he is, he represents enough of a threat to British establishment that they might think it’s no big deal to release Mada Pasa inside the country. He isn’t, after all, a foe of jihad violence. Those are the only people that British authorities want to keep out.

At a 2018 dinner of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), which he formerly headed, Farage said: “If dealing with Islamic fundamentalism becomes a battle between us and the entire religion, I’ll tell you the result: we’ll lose. We will simply lose….We absolutely have to get that Muslim majority living in many of our towns and cities on our side, more attuned to Western values than some pretty hardline interpretations of the Qur’an.”

Sure. Now how did Farage propose to do that? His warning against making the resistance to jihad a “battle between us and the entire religion” was odd. No sane person was saying that the West should go to war with the entire Islamic world. The likeliest interpretation of his statement was that he is saying that we must not speak about how jihadis find justification for their actions in the Qur’an and Sunnah, as that would supposedly alienate the “moderates.”

But if we don’t speak about such facts, how will we ever convince Muslims not to follow “hardline interpretations of the Qur’an”?

Another problem with Farage’s statement is that it manifested a remarkable ignorance of history. While he was deeply concerned that British people not begin to think that resisting jihad terror means that they are in a “battle” with the “entire religion” of Islam, he appeared to be unaware of the fact that many Muslims throughout history have considered their entire religion to be at war with the entire non-Muslim world.

This is documented abundantly in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. To take one of innumerable examples, Sharaf ad-Din Ali Yazdi, a fifteenth-century Persian who wrote a biography of the Mongol Muslim warrior Tamerlane, observed that “the Qur’an says the highest dignity man can attain is that of making war in person against the enemies of his religion. Muhammad advises the same thing, according to the tradition of the Muslim doctors: wherefore the great Temur always strove to exterminate the infidels, as much to acquire that glory, as to signalise himself by the greatness of his conquests.”

After conquest came dhimmitude, the subjugated status that the Qur’an mandates for “the People of the Book” (primarily Jews and Christians). In the early twelfth century, the Fatimid caliph Al-Amir bi-Ahkamillah issued this edict:

Now, the prior degradation of the infidels in this world before the life to come—where it is their lot—is considered an act of piety; and the imposition of their poll tax [jizya], “until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled” (Koran 9:29) is a divinely ordained obligation….The dhimmi’s payment of his dues by a bill drawn on a Muslim, or by delegating a real believer to pay it in his name will not be tolerated. It must be exacted from him directly in order to vilify and humiliate him, so that Islam and its people may be exalted and the race of infidels brought low. The jizya is to be imposed on all of them in full, without exception.

Underlying this subjugation is a deep contempt for non-Muslims. In the year 718, the Umayyad caliph Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz sent out a message to the governors of the various Islamic provinces:

O you who believe! The non-Muslims are nothing but dirt. Allah has created them to be partisans of Satan; most treacherous in regard to all they do; whose whole endeavor in this nether life is useless, though they themselves imagine that they are doing fine work. Upon them rests the curse of Allah, of the Angels and of man collectively

We must not think that we are at war with the entire religion, says Nigel Farage. But what, Mr. Farage, are we to think about the Muslims who consider themselves and their religion to be at war with us?

Nigel Farage is just another mainstream politician, and in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain, he actually manages to be one of the better ones. We hope he will be safe from Mada Pasa; we likewise hope that all British citizens will be safe from the jihadis who roam the streets while Farage and his ilk downplay the jihad threat.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.