By CatholicVote | Created at 2025-01-14 20:01:15 | Updated at 2025-01-18 05:18:26
3 days ago
CV NEWS FEED // A recent article in Crisis Magazine argued that the rape gangs run by Muslims in England are a form of religious warfare.
Sarah Cain wrote Jan. 13, “Ultimately, these systematic rapes were (and are) acts of war against a people whom they [Muslims] consider to be conquered. These children are the victims of a religious war that they didn’t know they were fighting.”
The crisis, which included the violent drugging, raping, and trafficking of underage girls, most likely began in the early 2000s, Cain wrote, and has been mishandled since then.
“When some of those girls eventually overcame the immense terror of what had happened to them and informed authorities,” Cain continued, “entire police departments, local city councils, and the nation’s Crown Prosecution Service refused to investigate out of fear that they would be viewed as racist and that they would create ‘community unrest.’”
Thus, the crimes went unpunished because authorities thought that the public’s reaction against the criminals would be worse than the crimes themselves, “and for thousands of girls and their devastated families, justice continues to be elusive.”
Cain added stories about the negligence of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who would arrest abused girls for underage drinking (after their rapists gave them alcohol) and refused to prosecute the predators harming the girls.
Cain stated that the only way to ensure the crimes stopped was to acknowledge the religious motivation behind them, adding, “If we do not acknowledge this, then we cannot have an honest conversation about immigration policy in the West.”
“It would be preposterous to expect, for example, that mass immigration from Hungary to England would similarly result in the gang rape of British schoolchildren,” Cain wrote. “Our feigned ignorance on this matter represents a political cowardice that betrays these children and condemns the next generation to a similar fate.”
Two years ago, the Yorkshire Post highlighted one of the gravest mishandlings in the crisis.
The Post reported that police gave a “no arrest” deal to Arshid Hussain in 2000, the ringleader of Rotherham’s infamous rape gangs, if he handed over the victim of his abuse to the police.
Hussain was ultimately arrested in 2016 and sentenced to 35 years in prison for 23 offenses against 9 girls. However, police issued no arrest and did not report child abuse in the 2000 incident.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct ruled that a police officer named Hassan Ali, who died in a car accident in 2015, arranged the deal. Ali denied the incident during interviews.
The court’s ruling stated, “We upheld the survivor’s report that SYP did not respond appropriately in a child abduction case which ended with the survivor being handed over to officers by the CSA/E perpetrator as part of a ‘deal’ not to arrest him.”
The court found no evidence that the police gave Hussain a child abduction warning. Moreover, the incident was not fully recorded or reported to other agencies.
It concluded, “The survivor reported that SYP’s dealings with them were not in line with appropriate policy and guidelines. We upheld this complaint, noting especially a general failure by SYP to properly record information about the CSA/E risk to the survivor.”
