Dem Strategist Roginsky: We Don’t Know How to Talk to ‘Normal People,’ We’re ‘Not the Party of Common Sense’

Dear FRiends, Please use this temporary link to donate by credit card via Authorize.Net:

Or click here to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Hopefully, we'll have our normal CC system up and running again soon. Thank you very much for your loyal support!

As long as you’re asking for people’s pronouns, you’re not talking to normal people and you’re not a normal person.

That Harris meme for her pronouns is great: Has/Been

Not to mention promoting sex change medical ‘care’ for minors.

On second thought, maybe promoting the genital mutilation of anxious children wasn’t such a good idea after all

Unfortunately for any Democrat who want to be normal, the Party decision makers are people who separated completely from the rest of mankind by their deviant sexual practices, globalist ideations and obscene amounts of (in many case unearned) wealth.

I’m thinking never/was. She didn’t get a single delegate vote in 20 or 24.

Yep! Pushing Drag Queens in elementary schools, want little kids to transition to a different sex, letting people in that don’t even speak English. Yeah I’d say you don’t know how to talk to normal people for a whole lot of reasons.

So, he admits they are not ‘normal people’!....................

I knew idiots would could out with views like that - they "spoke" just fine, nobody liked what they had to say.

https://www.history.com/news/thomas-paine-common-sense-revolution

Key Points Made in ‘Common Sense’
Here are some of Paine’s key points:

Government’s purpose was to serve the people. Paine described government as a “necessary evil,” which existed to give people a structure so they could work together to solve problems and prosper. But to do that, it had to be responsive to people’s needs. The British system, Paine argued, failed at that, because it gave the monarchy and nobles in Parliament too much power to thwart the people’s elected representatives. “The constitution of England is so exceedingly complex, that the nation may suffer for years together without being able to discover in which part the fault lies, some will say in one and some in another, and every political physician will advise a different medicine,” Paine wrote.

Having a king was a bad idea. Paine didn’t just find fault with British rule of the colonies. He ridiculed the very idea of having a hereditary monarch at all. “In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places, which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears,” Paine wrote. “A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”

America as the home of the free. Paine refuted the notion that Americans should be loyal to a mother country that he considered a bad parent. “Even brutes do not devour their young, nor savages make war upon their families,” he wrote. Besides, he argued, America’s real connection was to people everywhere who yearned to escape oppression. “This new world hath been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe,” Paine proclaimed. “Hither have they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the monster; and it is so far true of England, that the same tyranny which drove the first emigrants from home, pursues their descendants still.”

America had a rare opportunity to create a new nation based on self-rule. As Paine saw it, both Americans and the British knew it was inevitable that the colonies would break free. “I have never met with a man, either in England or America, who hath not confessed his opinion, that a separation between the countries, would take place one time or other.” And that time had come. America had raw materials, from timber and hemp to iron, and the skills that it needed to build and equip an army and navy for its defense. Just as important, the individual colonies had the potential to put aside differences and form a powerful nation. But they needed to do it quickly, before the population grew to a point where new divisions might develop. The moment in history was “that peculiar time, which never happens to a nation but once,” he wrote.

A strong central government was needed. Paine envisioned that the new nation would have a strong central government, with a constitution that protected individual rights, including freedom of religion. “A firm bargain and a right reckoning make long friends,” he argued.

do you suppose any of them have read our history?

But we’re so worried about alienating one or another cohort in our coalition that we don’t know what to say.”

So in your efforts to not alienate a miniscule minority of special interest groups, you end up alienating the vast majority of the citizens of the US.

I’ve never understood the Latinx thing. Why not just call them Latin?

Hey you dummy, all the right talking in the world isn’t going to convince 75 million people that pervs should be allowed in female bathrooms, that kids should get puberty blockers, that rapists in jail should get free trannie surgery, that electric cars should be shoved down our throats, that 200 billion is ok to send to far away wars while vets here starve .and the list goes and on.....what deluded beasts these people are.

They know how to talk to normal people just fine, it’s just that what they try to tell us is bullshit. Let’s see if they get to the point where they understand this is not a communications problem but a content problem.

And there it is, “We just weren’t effective in getting our message out”. Hilarious. Yeah, it’s nobody’s fault, just didn’t communicate effectively, you know, even with a billion dollar campaign. Wow.

Sounds good, but what she’s saying is they need to cram collectivism on the normies in their own language.

They haven’t actually learned anything.

I know a lot of people who speak Spanish who hate the term Latinx.