Democrats confirm two more Biden judges as GOP senators fail to show up

By Free Republic | Created at 2024-11-21 15:47:41 | Updated at 2024-11-22 06:20:24 15 hours ago
Truth

Skip to comments.

Democrats confirm two more Biden judges as GOP senators fail to show up
MSM.COM ^

Posted on 11/21/2024 7:07:17 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET

Democrats confirmed two more Biden judicial nominees to lifetime posts Wednesday in narrow votes, in part due to the absences of Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Braun (R-IN).

If the two senators had voted, the nominees would not have been cleared Wednesday because Vice President Kamala Harris would have been unavailable to break the 50-50 tie.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: awol

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

If they just SHOWED UP it would have been 50-50 with Kamaka unavailable drinking wine on the beach in Hawaii.

Braun in a known squish. Cruz I expect better.

1 posted on 11/21/2024 7:07:17 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET


To: DIRTYSECRET

Is Ted Cruz in Mexico again?


2 posted on 11/21/2024 7:08:20 AM PST by Dacula


To: DIRTYSECRET

3 posted on 11/21/2024 7:09:03 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)


To: DIRTYSECRET

Sorry, but this is a deliberate way to approve these liberal judges without having to publicly vote. It is cowardly.


4 posted on 11/21/2024 7:09:07 AM PST by Obadiah


To: DIRTYSECRET

2 judges. Mancin joined the gop in saying no on one and Sienma voted no on the other. No telling if they would have played along had Cruz/Braun had showed up but their vote on the filibuster suggests otherwise.

What bums me out is these people taking their jobs as serious as Kamala.


5 posted on 11/21/2024 7:10:30 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET


To: Dacula

He was with Vance and Trump the first time, not sure about the next day


6 posted on 11/21/2024 7:10:38 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)


To: DIRTYSECRET

I bet the Dems would have just “deemed” that Heels Up would break the tie. Rules who needs rules.


7 posted on 11/21/2024 7:12:57 AM PST by The Louiswu (Pray for Peace in the world.)


To: DIRTYSECRET

Cruz.....of all people.....damn SMH


8 posted on 11/21/2024 7:13:18 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)


To: DIRTYSECRET

Solution: Pass a law rescinding lifetime appointments for all but Supreme Court. Then flush.


To: DIRTYSECRET

republicans stay up at night to think of new ways to be useless...


10 posted on 11/21/2024 7:17:46 AM PST by wny


To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

11 posted on 11/21/2024 7:20:30 AM PST by Jaysin (Trump can't be beat, unless the democrats cheat)


Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: DIRTYSECRET

Two more RAT POS to push around Americans.


13 posted on 11/21/2024 7:25:59 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Let's Go Brandon! FCS (Schumer))


To: DIRTYSECRET

Cruz missed another vote last summer that was crucial. I agree, he is doing it on purpose. It is getting very hard for the RINO”s to continue to appear to be conservative. I understand he originally did not vote for Scott as Senate Majority Leader, and was allowed to change his vote to Scott to appear more conservative. I read Marsha Blackburn did the same.


14 posted on 11/21/2024 7:27:45 AM PST by oil_dude


To: DIRTYSECRET

Figures. POS Cruz wins relection and goes right back to the behavior that made voting for him more difficult. People are tired of his letter writing, hand wringing, and blathering on conservative news sites, and instead want action. Yet another example of his indifference to ensuring Demonic defeat and slowing the progression of their perversion of the country...



To: DIRTYSECRET

Just have Trump DEFUND their positions. No money no job


16 posted on 11/21/2024 7:28:16 AM PST by Singermom


To: Jaysin

--- "why not the SC also?"

Fine question. Because a term longer than two four-year terms of a next Obama would keep "fundamental transformation" from igniting the same damn "fundamental transformation."


To: DIRTYSECRET

18 posted on 11/21/2024 7:31:12 AM PST by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)


To: DIRTYSECRET

Lifetime? Didn’t Bill Clinton fire all of the “lifetime” judges appointed by Bush Sr.?

I’m confused. They may be lifetime appointments, but they can be fired by the incoming executive. At least that is what I thought.


19 posted on 11/21/2024 7:31:15 AM PST by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)


To: DIRTYSECRET

“Principled Conservative”


20 posted on 11/21/2024 7:32:01 AM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Read Entire Article