Europe Intelligence Brief — Friday, 25 September 2026

One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Spain — Shamed by one eviction, and legislating from it.
Italy — Policing the classroom, and arguing with its own head of state.
Poland — Rehearsing the worst without panic, and printing the instructions.
Hungary — Rewarded for undoing old habits, and told the money is not yet in hand.
Europe’s mood on Friday was defensive and domestic. In Madrid, Rome and Warsaw the week’s hardest arguments were not about Russia or the euro but about who belongs in a flat, in a classroom and in a shelter.
The temper is not fear so much as boundary-drawing. Four governments moved this week to say who sits inside a protected circle, and each was at once asked by its own institutions to justify the line.
Spain found its boundary in a single photograph. Police carried an 87-year-old woman out of the Madrid flat her family had rented since 1956 on Wednesday, and by Friday the cabinet had a housing decree written for next week.
Italy drew its line through the school register. Its cabinet approved a decree on Thursday that turns a limit written as guidance in 2010 into a binding 30 per cent ceiling on pupils who do not know Italian well, and fines a covered face at the school gate.
Poland’s line is physical, and it published the map. The interior ministry issued a step-by-step guide on Friday to what a citizen should do when something comes out of the sky, counting 85,000 places to shelter for 23.7 million people.
Hungary’s is bureaucratic, and it is being paid for. The European Commission proposed on Wednesday to release €4.2 billion (about US$4.79 billion) it had withheld from Budapest since 2022, and the member governments have a month to agree.
Key Facts
—
Madrid’s evicted pensioner. María del Carmen Abascal, 87, was removed from the Madrid flat her family had rented since 1956 on Wednesday 23 September, the news site Spain in English reported.
—
Spain’s fivefold rent rise. Spain in English and The Local both put the new rent at €2,650 a month (about US$3,022) against about €500 (about US$570) before, more than five times as much.
—
Italy’s cap made binding. A 30 per cent limit on pupils who do not know Italian well has existed since a 2010 circular, and a decree of 24 September makes it binding, Il Post reported.
—
Italy’s face-covering fine. The decree sets a fine of €200 to €1,000 (about US$228 to US$1,140) for a covered face at school, and President Sergio Mattarella has still to sign it.
—
Poland’s shelter arithmetic. Poland has identified 85,000 shelter points for 23.7 million people, 64 per cent of the population, in guidance its interior ministry published on Friday.
—
Hungary’s unfrozen money. The European Commission proposed on 23 September releasing €4.2 billion (about US$4.79 billion) in regional aid to Hungary, which the Council must approve within a month.
—
Serbia’s published polling. A Faktor Plus survey put Aleksandar Vučić’s list at 48.6 per cent and the Student List at 37.1, with fieldwork from 16 to 20 September, the Bulgarian state agency BTA reported.
—
Germany’s fuel-tax cut. The Bundesrat approved a cut of 14.04 cents a litre in energy tax (about US$0.16) on 25 September, after the Bundestag passed it by 434 votes to 128.
Madrid Finds Its Face For A Housing Crisis
Spain has spent three days arguing with one photograph. Police carried María del Carmen Abascal, who is 87 and uses a wheelchair, out of a flat in Madrid’s Retiro district on Wednesday, the English-language site Spain in English reported.
Her family had held the flat since 1956 under one of Spain’s old controlled tenancies, which pass from parent to child. She was taken out on a stretcher and driven to hospital, and hundreds of people had gathered in the street to stop it.
What the landlord asked for is the figure that made the case national. Spain in English and The Local both put the new rent at €2,650 a month (about US$3,022) against about €500 (about US$570) before, which is more than five times as much.
One wire figure does not fit that base. Agence France-Presse, a French wire service, put the increase at 275 per cent and printed no euro amount, and that percentage does not reconcile with a move from €500 to €2,650 (about US$570 to US$3,022).
Her income sets the scale of what was demanded. Spain in English put her pension at about €1,400 a month (about US$1,596), roughly half the new rent.
The company rejects the label its critics use. Urbagestión Desarrollo e Inversión said it is neither an investment fund nor a vulture fund but “una sencilla pyme”, a simple small business, eldiario.es, a left-leaning Spanish news site, reported on 23 September.
It also denies the scale the word fund implies, saying “No somos propietarios de ninguna otra vivienda”. It owns no other home, on that account.
Abascal answered from her hospital bed at the Gregorio Marañón. In a video released by the Madrid tenants’ union and carried by eldiario.es on Friday she said: “No he logrado defender mi casa. Pero sí he luchado para que los demás aprendan a luchar por la suya”.
That is a defeat claimed as a lesson. She had not managed to defend her home, she said, but she had fought so that others learn to fight for theirs.
Her second line names the target rather than the landlord. She said in the same video: “Lo que quiero es que este problema con los fondos buitre se elimine de una vez”. What she wants is for this problem with vulture funds to be got rid of once and for all.
The row inside Spain is about who is to blame rather than who should be ashamed. Pedro Sánchez called the eviction an unacceptable “social tragedy” and blamed Madrid’s conservative-led city and regional governments, Agence France-Presse reported.
The housing minister pointed the same way. Isabel Rodríguez described Wednesday as a “sad and dramatic day” and called on Madrid’s regional president and the city’s mayor to act, The Local and Spain in English reported.
A centre-left daily refused to let the law off. El País wrote in an editorial: “The law was upheld and the market worked. But it is the law of the jungle in a broken market, and it is a failure”, in Agence France-Presse’s account.
The government’s answer is a decree it does not yet have the votes for. A moratorium on evicting people with no suitable alternative accommodation is expected to form part of a royal decree-law going to the cabinet on Tuesday 29 September.
The text is not settled. Spain in English reported that it is still under negotiation, and that the People’s Party has so far distanced itself from the talks.
The housing minister named the obstacle herself. The government can approve it, she said, but “without the support of the groups it will not become law”, in that site’s translation.
Its own partners want more than it is offering. Sumar, the left-wing junior party in the coalition, wants the flat compulsorily bought, and Yolanda Díaz, the second deputy prime minister and labour minister, called for “the expropriation of Maricarmen’s home and a package to freeze rents”.
The votes it needs come from two directions at once. Junts per Catalunya, a Catalan pro-independence party, has offered tax breaks for landlords, while Podemos, a party to the government’s left, will negotiate only if changes to land law are left out.
The right refuses the premise of the appeal. Cuca Gamarra of the conservative People’s Party was blunt on the public radio network RNE that the government cannot make anyone else responsible for its own lack of a housing policy, the Spanish political site Moncloa.com reported.
The leader of the opposition asks for the job rather than defends a record. Alberto Núñez Feijóo said on Friday, after closing his party foundation’s summer campus in Madrid, that the government has had eight years and has not been able to solve the problem, Moncloa.com reported.
He put his own claim in one clause. Feijóo asked for a chance to solve the housing problem, “yo pido una oportunidad para solucionar el problema de vivienda”, and said the government cannot hold anyone else responsible for its lack of a housing policy.
He also put a number on the scale of it. Feijóo said there were about 25,000 evictions in Spain last year, 11 per cent more than the year before, in the same account.
Madrid’s regional president answers with the chain of command. Isabel Díaz Ayuso noted that the eviction was carried out “por orden de un juez y con presencia de la Policía Nacional”, by order of a judge and with the National Police present, Moncloa.com reported.
Her point is about who writes the law. Ayuso said that whoever can change the rules governing these procedures is whoever has been in government for eight years: “Quien puede cambiar las leyes que regulan estos procedimientos es quien lleva ocho años en el Gobierno”.
The party’s other argument is that the decree would not have helped this tenant. Moncloa.com reported that the housing decree Congress rejected in March was aimed at tenancies governed by the urban rental law of 1994, and Abascal’s dated from 1956.
The same account carries the party’s measure of the market. It says the price of rent has accumulated an increase of 44 per cent.
Ayuso is blunter about the government’s response. She accused it of “demagoguery” and of “not doing anything” during Sánchez’s eight years in office, the same French wire service reported.
Separately she widened it into a quarrel about maps. Ara, a Catalan daily, reported her saying the case was one of the 25,000 evictions that happen every year, and that for every eviction in Madrid there are five in Catalonia.
The judicial figures in that report do not carry the ratio. Ara reported 25,540 evictions in 2025, of which 6,814 were in Catalonia and 2,267 in Madrid, which is about three to one rather than five to one.
Ara also carries what cuts the other way. It notes that Madrid has about a million fewer inhabitants than Catalonia and a median household income about 8 per cent higher.
The lawyer’s complaint is about the law and not the landlord. Beatriz Duro, who acts for Abascal, said there is no legal umbrella that enables the suspension of the eviction of vulnerable people, the same wire service reported.
The background numbers explain why one eviction became national. Average prices a square metre have risen about 50 per cent in ten years, in the same wire report.
The public alternative is very small. Spain’s stock of public housing is 1.2 per cent of the total on the figures of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, in the same wire report, carried by Courthouse News.
Money was offered and refused before the police came. An unnamed Spanish writer offered to pay the €2,150 difference (about US$2,452) for the rest of her life so that she could go on paying €500 (about US$570), and the company rejected it, Spain in English reported.
By Friday the company had moved twice, in opposite directions. It offered the flat to Madrid City Council so that the municipal housing company could let it back to her at a social or affordable rent through the council’s Reviva scheme, eldiario.es reported.
It also went to court against her supporters. Urbagestión is claiming €10,000 (about US$11,403) from the Sindicato de Inquilinas, the Madrid tenants’ union, for calling it a “fondo buitre”, a vulture fund, in the same account.
What steadies Spain is that the landlord has moved and the cabinet has a date. What could stop the law is arithmetic, because the text is still being negotiated, the People’s Party has so far stayed out of the talks, and an earlier housing decree was already voted down in March.
Rome Draws A Line Through The Classroom
Italy has made an old rule binding rather than written a new one. The 30 per cent limit was set by a circular of 2010 issued by the then education minister, Mariastella Gelmini, the Italian news site Il Post reported.
The decree-law approved on Thursday follows that circular closely. Il Post says it “lo ricalca quasi interamente”, traces it almost entirely, and that the difference is that the circular allowed exemptions and left schools their autonomy while the decree does not.
The same report doubts the effect, writing “Nei fatti però potrebbe cambiare poco”. In practice, it says, little may change.
The cap is narrower than it first sounds. It bites on the first class of each stage rather than on every classroom, and it counts pupils without an adequate school background rather than every foreign child, in that site’s account.
The penalties fall on adults. A covered face at school carries a fine of €200 to €1,000 (about US$228 to US$1,140), and the parents pay when the pupil is a minor, the Italian news agency ANSA reported.
The rule names what it means by a covered face. It takes in the burqa and the niqab, and a surgical mask worn by a pupil who is not ill, in the same account.
Parents are given homework too, and only some of them. The obligation to attend free Italian courses bites where the child does not know Italian and “anche la famiglia non conosce l’italiano”, the family does not know it either, ANSA reported.
Money follows the obligation. A fund of €17.5 million (about US$19.96 million) is set aside for schools that cannot meet the cap, in the same report.
How much of Italy this touches depends on what is counted, and both figures are the minister’s own. Giuseppe Valditara said at Palazzo Chigi that “sono 34mila le classi che hanno numero di stranieri che supera il 30%”, 34,000 classes in which foreign pupils exceed 30 per cent, ANSA reported.
He gave attainment as the reason for acting. Implicit dropout, meaning the failure to reach the expected competences, runs at 5.7 per cent for Italian pupils and 10 per cent for foreign ones, he said, in the same report.
That count is not the threshold the decree uses. Valditara said the new rule would touch about 1,000 classrooms, or 0.3 per cent of the total, Al Jazeera, the Qatari state-funded broadcaster, reported, because it reaches only first-year classes and only pupils without adequate prior schooling.
The ministry’s own background figures are modest. Non-citizen pupils were 11.2 per cent of Italy’s school population in 2022-23, and classes with more than 30 per cent foreign pupils were 7.6 per cent of the total, on education ministry data quoted by Al Jazeera.
The minister frames it as language rather than origin. Valditara said the objective is to put the Italian language at the centre as a great instrument of integration, and that knowing Italian means integrating, in quotations printed by ANSA.
He also drew a line against the past. Old circulars, he said, were only recommendations and had no binding force as a law does, ANSA reported, which is an answer to the charge that his own head of state once did the same thing more gently.
The prime minister put it as common sense. Giorgia Meloni wrote on her own account that the tools to learn Italian and to stop burqas and niqabs in schools were “common sense that do not divide”, that broadcaster reported.
She described the aim in the same post. It was, she wrote, “a school that integrates without giving up on rules”, in that outlet’s translation of her Italian.
The president had already said something else about schools. Sergio Mattarella, opening the school year at Amatrice, said the school is the most effective lever of integration for those who come from other countries, the same Italian news site reported.
He warned in the same speech against forming ghettos and raising barriers. Meloni replied that when Mattarella was education minister he wrote circulars urging that foreign pupils be spread out, in a television interview on 22 September quoted by that same site.
The unions call it a flag rather than a policy. Gianna Fracassi, general secretary of the left-leaning FLC CGIL teaching union, called it “l’ennesimo intervento propagandistico”, one more propaganda measure, in quotations printed by ANSA.
Her second objection is about what the decree leaves out. She said turning access to education into an ideological banner to chase easy electoral consent is a very grave act.
The union’s own priorities are elsewhere. The decree, she said, ignores the two decisive questions for those who work in schools, which are pay and job insecurity.
The head teachers doubt it can be done at all. Attilio Fratta, president of DirigentiScuola, the head teachers’ union, called it propagandistic and in the final analysis unrealisable, and said measures of this weight are not adopted once the school year has begun, ANSA reported.
A second body of principals accepts the problem and not the remedy. Antonello Giannelli, president of the National Association of Principals, said the issue is well-founded and valid from an educational point of view but difficult to turn into a practical solution, Al Jazeera reported.
The opposition reads it as a distraction. Elly Schlein, leader of the centre-left Democratic Party, called it “a shameful decree that seeks to hide the government’s inability to address the real problems of the public school system behind a new ideological banner”, in that account.
There is a party further to the right of Meloni’s nationalist conservative Brothers of Italy. The National Future party of the former general Roberto Vannacci, which campaigns for what it calls remigration, demanded a crackdown on burqas in schools in July, in the same report.
What steadies Rome is that a decree-law takes effect at once and the money is named. What could unpick it is that parliament has 60 days to ratify it and President Mattarella has still to sign it, Al Jazeera reported.

Warsaw Rehearses The Worst, Calmly
Poland spent Friday teaching itself a drill. Its interior ministry published guidance on where to take cover in an air attack and how to prepare a home, Notes From Poland, an English-language site covering Polish affairs, reported.
The guidance covers where a person happens to be. It sets out what to do if the sirens sound at home, at work, outdoors or in a car, in the same report.
The instructions are domestic and unglamorous. People are told to take an evacuation rucksack and their medicines, to use the stairs rather than the lift, and, if reaching a shelter would mean too long in the open, to stay in a central room without windows.
The state has also chosen how to deliver it. The guidance goes on ministry websites, out through the regional governors to local councils and into mObywatel, the Polish government’s own citizen app, the Polish security-affairs site infosecurity24.pl reported on Thursday.
A deputy minister described the point of it plainly. Magdalena Roguska called it “nowa część, którą dajemy mieszkańcom”, a new part that is being given to residents, and said the aim is that people should know in advance where it is safe to go, in the same account.
The scale of it is now counted. Poland has identified 85,000 shelter points able to hold 23.7 million people, which is 64 per cent of the population, and 17 million households were sent safety handbooks earlier this year, Notes From Poland reported.
The minister’s tone was deliberately flat. Marcin Kierwiński said: “When a threat arises, we warn the Polish people and defend our security. It is only natural that we prepare for worst-case scenarios, while deeply believing that they will never come to pass.”
He was careful about what does not yet exist. Evacuation plans are being prepared and lean heavily on the strength of the whole crisis-response system, he said, and the more that system is strengthened the more precise the plans become.
The foreign minister was blunter about the reason. Notes From Poland reported him saying that multiple sources suggested that “Russia is planning something big this year”, and that President Vladimir Putin may need a pretext for mobilisation, so Russia might carry out a false-flag attack.
The week gave that argument a small and precise illustration. A Russian Mi-8 military helicopter crossed from the Kaliningrad exclave into Polish airspace on Wednesday, about 350 yards deep and for 42 seconds, the American forces newspaper Stars and Stripes reported.
Where it happened is not in dispute. It was near Braniewo in the Warmia region, close to the Vistula Lagoon, at an altitude of 300 metres, Breitbart, a right-wing American news site, reported, and Polish fighter aircraft were sent up while ground units stood by.
Poland’s military read the flight as a test. Its operational command said fighter aircraft were scrambled and ground-based forces and assets remained on standby, and described the flight as meant to test the air-defence preparedness of NATO, the Western military alliance, Stars and Stripes reported.
The defence minister put it in a sequence. Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said: “These are not isolated incidents, but an element of constant pressure.”
The list behind that sentence is short and recent. Stars and Stripes recorded a Russian Il-20 reconnaissance aircraft intercepted about 30 miles off the Polish coast over the Baltic Sea.
Romania had its own alarm the following morning. It scrambled two F-16 fighter jets early on Thursday after an unidentified aerial target crossed into the country from Ukraine, its defence ministry said, in the same report.
Not everyone on that border reads it the same way. Stars and Stripes reported that some regional officials warned against unnecessary panic, and that Estonia’s foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, said on Wednesday there are no indications of a looming Russian attack on NATO.
His reason is what his own frontier looks like. “It’s empty on the other side of Estonia’s border because Russia’s troops are in Ukraine. Therefore, all the talk about Russia potentially attacking NATO soon is simply not supported by what we see on the ground”, he said.
The president is pressing a different answer, and it is American. Karol Nawrocki said in a Bloomberg interview on 22 September that “I think that this matter is for sure confirmed because President Trump is famous for keeping his word”, Notes From Poland reported.
Washington had made no formal confirmation of the base by 14.40 UTC on Friday. Mr Trump had said that “if this happens, the location [of the base] will be announced very soon”, Notes From Poland reported.
The cost is a floor, and it is Poland’s share. The deputy defence minister, Stanisław Wziątek, said it would “definitely be more than 15 billion zloty” (about US$3.91 billion) but would depend on the level of involvement of the United States, in the same report.
What steadies Poland is that the preparation is public and dull. What is unfinished is the physical part, because the shelters themselves are to be marked only by the end of 2026, Notes From Poland reported.
A Polish Legend Is Cleared, And Nobody Is Satisfied
The same country spent Friday closing a quarrel about its own founding story. Warsaw prosecutors discontinued the case against Lech Wałęsa, the shipyard electrician who led the Solidarity movement and became Poland’s first freely elected president, Notes From Poland reported.
The charge was about words, not about the past itself. He was accused of lying when he denied that documents said to show he had informed for the communist secret police were his, in the same report.
The file at the centre of it was found in a general’s house. Papers carrying Wałęsa’s apparent signature, including a commitment to collaborate, payslips and an informant’s notes, turned up in the home archive of Czesław Kiszczak, the communist interior minister, and Wałęsa has always said they were forged.
The prosecutors’ reason is technical, and it is about handwriting. They found methodological errors in the attribution and said there was no evidence to assume with 100 per cent certainty that the comparative material actually came from Lech Wałęsa, Notes From Poland reported.
Their second reason is harsher on him than an acquittal. The evidence, they said, clearly indicated that Wałęsa did not write long manuscripts during his life, and some witnesses explicitly stated that at that time he was a secondary illiterate.
The government treated the decision as a verdict on its predecessor. Waldemar Żurek, the justice minister and prosecutor general, said a politicised state apparatus hounded the legend of Solidarity, deliberately ignoring facts and basic logic, and that truth has triumphed over an attempt to rewrite history.
The historian who assembled the file rejects the reasoning. Sławomir Cenckiewicz, a former national security adviser, said he had never read a bigger lie, and asked how a secondary illiterate could have led Solidarity and then governed Poland, Notes From Poland reported.
Polish opinion on him has been less evenly split than the case. A 2017 poll found 62 per cent of Poles calling Wałęsa a national hero against 28 per cent who did not, Notes From Poland reported.
What steadies the matter is that a prosecutor, not a politician, ended it. What keeps it open is that the decision rests on a judgement about one man’s handwriting, and both sides read the same reasoning as proof of bad faith.
Budapest Is Paid For Its Conversion
Hungary is being rewarded for dismantling machinery it spent a decade building. The European Commission, the Union’s executive, proposed on Wednesday to unlock €4.2 billion (about US$4.79 billion) in regional aid frozen since 2022.
It would also reopen two programmes to Hungarian academics. Access to the Erasmus+ exchange and the Horizon Europe research programme would be restored for students and researchers from universities maintained by Hungarian Public Interest Trusts.
The change of government is the reason. Péter Magyar’s administration, which replaced Viktor Orbán’s after the April election, notified Brussels on 9 September of new rules on public procurement, asset declarations, conflicts of interest and judicial review of prosecutors’ decisions.
The Commission president chose careful praise. Ursula von der Leyen said: “Hungary has taken important steps to strengthen the rule of law and protect the Union’s financial interests.”
Hungary also joined the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Union’s own fraud prosecutor. The Commission listed that beside stronger powers for Hungary’s Integrity Authority and tighter control of public procurement as the steps that changed its mind.
The money is not in Budapest’s hands. The Council of the European Union, where the member governments sit, must approve the proposal within a month, the Brussels agency Agence Europe reported, and EUobserver reported technical discussions set for 24 September and 1 October.
The Council had announced no decision by 14.40 UTC on Friday. Whether it will adopt the proposal unchanged is not yet known.
The wider sum explains the politics. Reuters reported that €16.4 billion (about US$18.70 billion) of recovery and regional money had been frozen, and that the Union said in May it would release it as Hungary passed its reforms.
Some of it has gone for good. Agence Europe, a Brussels agency, and Hungarian Conservative, a right-wing Hungarian magazine aligned with the former governing party, both record that about €2 billion (about US$2.28 billion) was lost permanently when deadlines expired.
Brussels was more cautious than Budapest when the outline deal was struck in May. A senior Commission official told POLITICO Brussels: “We haven’t agreed to disburse the funds. We’ve agreed on a list of commitments which, if completed by 31 Aug, will trigger the payment of those funds”, Hungarian Conservative reported on 30 May.
Budapest did complete them, which is why Wednesday happened. The Commission acted on 23 September, a fortnight after Hungary notified its remedies.
The Hungarian right’s objection is about the price rather than the paperwork. Viktor Orbán said of Mr Magyar in May: “We know this. What we do not know is what he promised in exchange”, in the same report.
He put it as concealment. It is time to stop the deception and honestly tell Hungarians what was handed over from Hungarian interests, he said then, and his party has not withdrawn the charge since.
Some money stays frozen for reasons the proposal does not touch. More than €530 million (about US$604.36 million) remains blocked over disputes on migration, asylum and questions concerning lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people, Hungarian Conservative reported in May.
What steadies Budapest is that the conditions are written down and the Commission has signed them off. What could reverse it is that the mechanism which froze the money can freeze it again, and the Council has not yet voted.
Belgrade Votes While Its President Steps Aside
Serbia is running an election that a year of protest forced on it. Aleksandar Vučić dissolved the National Assembly on 9 September and called a parliamentary vote for 25 October, after more than a year of street protests led by students demanding exactly that, the Italian European-affairs outlet Eunews reported.
His stated reason was clarity. Serbia needs results that can clearly define and demonstrate the will of its citizens about the direction the country intends to follow, he said in a televised address, in that outlet’s account.
The president has put a date on his own departure. Vučić has announced that he will step down on Sunday 27 September, the Bulgarian state news agency BTA reported on Friday.
He spent Thursday evening in New York on other business. He said there that he had discussed energy agreements and the sale of Russia’s majority stake in the Serbian oil company NIS, and the work of Russian Railways in Serbia, in the same report.
The published polling describes a race he can still win. A survey by Faktor Plus taken from 16 to 20 September put the list headed by Vučić at 48.6 per cent and the Student List at 37.1, BTA reported on 21 September.
Both numbers moved, and the challengers moved faster. The president’s list gained 1.4 percentage points on the previous survey and the students gained 5.6, which BTA attributed in part to several opposition parties withdrawing from the race.
The pollster hedged in public. Vladimir Pejić, executive director of the Serbian polling firm Faktor Plus, said the campaign was heating up and the figures could change as it progressed.
He also read the governing party’s position as solid. It was retaining its electorate, he said, and could reach an absolute majority if conditions held, BTA reported.
He also intends to change jobs rather than leave politics. His party nominated him as its candidate for prime minister on 6 September, which would move him from the presidency to the office that governs, the Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported.
Three opposition parties have cleared the field for the students. BTA reported the withdrawal from the race of the People’s Movement of Serbia, Ecological Uprising and New Face of Serbia, which consolidated the opposition vote.
No statement from the Student List had been published in English by 14.40 UTC on Friday. What steadies Belgrade is that a date now exists where a year of protest had produced none, and what unsettles it is that the man who set the date leaves the presidency on Sunday.
The German Cut Clears Its Second Chamber
Germany came within one signature on Friday of finishing what it had argued about all week. The Bundestag, the elected lower house, passed the temporary reduction in fuel duty by 434 votes to 128, the German news site BYC-News reported.
The upper house followed within hours. The Bundesrat, where the sixteen federal states are represented, records on its own pages that it “billigte am 25. September 2026 ein kurz zuvor vom Bundestag beschlossenes Gesetz für das Absenken der Energiesteuersätze für Diesel und Benzin”.
That sentence approves the law without finishing it. It says the chamber approved on 25 September 2026 a law passed shortly before by the Bundestag to lower the energy-tax rates on diesel and petrol.
One step is still to come, and it is the one Italy is also waiting for. The same page says that after the Bundesrat’s approval “wird das Gesetz dem Bundespräsidenten zur Ausfertigung vorgelegt und anschließend im Bundesgesetzblatt verkündet”, that the law goes to the federal president to be signed and is then published in the federal law gazette.
The size of it is what the week reported. Energy tax falls by 14.04 cents a litre (about US$0.16), from 1 October to 31 December.
The Bundesrat is careful about the figure at the pump. It says the arithmetic gives “eine mögliche Entlastung von bis zu 17 Cent brutto je Liter”, a possible relief of up to 17 gross cents a litre (about US$0.19).
Whether it reaches the pump is not settled by the law. The Bundesrat says the oil companies and filling-station operators decide that with their pricing, and that “eine gesetzliche Pflicht zur vollständigen Weitergabe gibt es nicht”, there is no legal duty to pass it on in full.
The Bundestag gave a reason a São Paulo reader will recognise. The Bundesrat records that the cut “wurde im Bundestag mit den negativen wirtschaftlichen Folgen des Iran-Krieges begründet”, justified by the negative economic consequences of the Iran war.
The German account puts the same cause at the pump. The news site BYC-News gives the cut as a response to sharply higher fuel prices from the current Middle East conflict.
The bill is split down the middle. The relief is worth about €2.5 billion (about US$2.85 billion), with the federal government and the states each carrying €1.25 billion (about US$1.43 billion), BYC-News reported.
This is the second such cut of the year. BYC-News reported that the government took a comparable decision in the spring and lowered energy tax on petrol and diesel from 1 May to 30 June.
The spring round is the government’s own argument for this one. On the account of the federal government and the competition authorities the relief then largely reached consumers, BYC-News reported.
What steadies Berlin is that both chambers have voted and the money is identified. What is not finished is the law itself, which awaits the federal president’s signature and publication, so Germany stands where Italy stands.
The reasons of the 128 who voted against had not been published by 14.40 UTC on Friday. Nothing reaches a pump before 1 October in any case, and the sixteen states are paying for half of a cut they did not propose.
Kyiv Works Through Another Friday
Ukraine’s capital was struck through Friday and the count rose all day. Russian attacks on Kyiv on 25 September killed five people and injured 31, of whom 15 were taken to hospital including two children, Meduza, an independent Russian-language outlet based outside Russia and banned there, reported at 12.02 UTC.
The night was heavy by any measure. Russia used 282 attack drones of various types together with Zircon anti-ship missiles and Iskander-M, S-400 and KN-23 ballistic missiles, the Kyiv Independent reported, citing Ukraine’s air force.
The boy died in a tower block. A drone struck a residential building in the Pecherskyi district of the capital, and Meduza reported that the 14-year-old was killed and seven people in that district were injured.
The office building was in another district and later in the day. Ukrinform, the Ukrainian state news agency, reported that four people were killed and seven injured in the strike on the building in the Solomianskyi district, one of the injured a child.
Meduza reported where the dead were found. The bodies were in the car park beside the struck building, and cars there caught fire, in its account of the same strike.
Moscow gave a different account of the night. Russia’s defence ministry said its strikes had targeted a drone assembly and storage site in the Kyiv region, military warehouses, a port and a cargo ship in the Odesa region, Meduza reported.
The damage was not confined to the capital. Meduza reported a hospital building damaged in Zaporizhzhia with a fire in one ward and two people injured, and one resident killed and one injured in the Odesa region.
What steadies Kyiv is that its own city authorities publish each toll within hours and correct it in public. What does not steady it is that the counts were still rising on Friday afternoon, while the hryvnia stood at 44.97 to the dollar on a market reading at 13.55 UTC.
What This Means From Latin America
Read from São Paulo or Bogotá, Friday’s Europe is a continent legislating about belonging while its energy bill does the deciding. Rents, school budgets and air-defence spending are all being argued about in the same week and out of the same purse.
The barrel that pays for and provokes it moved both ways. November Brent, the front month, settled at US$106.60 a barrel on Thursday, up US$3.52 or 3.42 per cent, and had given back US$1.25 to US$105.35 on a reading at 13.58 UTC on Friday.
November West Texas Intermediate did the same in smaller steps. It settled at US$94.61 on Thursday and read US$93.35 at 13.58 UTC on Friday, down US$1.26 or 1.33 per cent.
Gas is the sharper story for a European winter. The November natural-gas contract settled at US$3.297 per million British thermal units on Thursday, up 9.06 per cent in one session, and read US$3.198 at 13.55 UTC on Friday, down 3.00 per cent.
Europe’s own markets were still open when these figures were taken, so none of them is a close. Frankfurt’s DAX index of leading German shares read 25,436.81 at 13.52 UTC, up 170.28 or 0.67 per cent, after closing down 144.10 or 0.57 per cent on Thursday.
London and Paris were flatter. The FTSE 100 read 10,690.99 at 13.52 UTC, up 10.99 or 0.10 per cent, and the CAC 40 read 8,084.89, up 3.46 or 0.04 per cent, both measured against Thursday’s lower closes.
The currency board turned, and that reaches every importer in this brief. The European Central Bank’s euro reference rate for 25 September was US$1.1403, against 1.1367 on 24 September, 1.1411 on 23 September and 1.1463 on 22 September.
The dollar’s four-day run stalled with it. The ICE dollar index read 100.949 at 13.55 UTC, down 0.341 or 0.34 per cent on Thursday’s close of 101.29.
Government borrowing costs mark the two ends of Europe. The German ten-year government bond was about 3.60 per cent on 25 September and the British ten-year 5.37 per cent.
The two central banks are in different places. The European Central Bank’s deposit facility stands at 2.50 per cent, decided on 10 September and in force since 16 September.
London held where Frankfurt moved. The Bank of England kept its Bank Rate at 3.75 per cent on 16 September by six votes to three, with the three preferring a quarter-point rise.
For a Latin American finance ministry the lesson is about sequencing rather than ideology. Brazil is cutting where Europe has been raising, with its own benchmark at 13.75 per cent after a quarter-point reduction on 16 September, and the same barrel sits on both desks.
What We Are Watching
- Spain’s cabinet takes the housing decree — Tuesday 29 September. The royal decree-law carries a moratorium on evicting people with no suitable alternative accommodation, and Congress must approve it afterwards for it to become law.
- Italy’s parliament must ratify the school decree — Within 60 days of Thursday 24 September. President Sergio Mattarella has still to sign it, and the 30 per cent limit has existed as guidance since 2010.
- The Council decides on Hungary’s frozen money — Within a month of Wednesday 23 September, Agence Europe reported. EUobserver reported technical discussions on 24 September and 1 October.
- Germany’s fuel-tax cut is signed and published — Before Thursday 1 October. Both chambers voted on 25 September and the law now goes to the federal president for signature and to the federal law gazette, the Bundesrat says.
- Vučić steps down as Serbia’s president — Sunday 27 September, BTA reported. He is his party’s candidate for prime minister at the parliamentary election of Sunday 25 October.
- Poland’s shelters are to be marked — By the end of 2026, Notes From Poland reported. The interior ministry has already counted 85,000 shelter points and sent handbooks to 17 million households.
- Serbia votes for a new parliament — Sunday 25 October. The last published national survey, with fieldwork from 16 to 20 September, put the Vučić list at 48.6 per cent and the Student List at 37.1.
- Germany’s fuel relief expires — Thursday 31 December, when the 14.04-cent cut (about US$0.16 a litre) ends and the price at the pump returns to the full rate of energy tax.
The Bigger Picture
Europe on Friday was a continent deciding who is inside the fence. A Spanish flat, an Italian first-year class, a Polish cellar and a Hungarian compliance file are four versions of the same question about who the state protects.
The instruments are unalike and the reflex is the same. Two of them are decrees, one is a leaflet and one is a conditionality mechanism, and every one of them is waiting on somebody else’s signature or vote.
What steadies the week is that almost every claim here rests on a named document or a recorded vote. The Bundesrat published its own approval, the Commission published its own reasoning, and Poland published the leaflet itself.
Each of them can still turn inside a fortnight. Spain’s cabinet meets on Tuesday, the Italian and German laws both await a head of state’s signature, the Council has a month to answer Budapest, and Serbia’s president steps down on Sunday.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Maricarmen and why has Spain stopped to look at her?
María del Carmen Abascal is an 87-year-old Madrid woman who uses a wheelchair and whose family had rented the same flat in the Retiro district since 1956. Police removed her on Wednesday 23 September and she was taken to hospital, the news site Spain in English reported. Spain in English and The Local both put the new rent at €2,650 a month (about US$3,022) against about €500 (about US$570) before, more than five times as much, while Agence France-Presse put the increase at 275 per cent and gave no euro figure. A moratorium on evicting people who have no suitable alternative accommodation is expected to form part of a royal decree-law going to the cabinet on Tuesday 29 September, with the text still under negotiation.
Has Italy actually banned face veils and capped foreign pupils in class?
The cabinet approved a decree-law on Thursday 24 September, which in Italy takes effect at once but must be ratified by parliament within 60 days. The 30 per cent limit on pupils who do not know Italian well is not new. It was set by a circular of 2010, and the decree “lo ricalca quasi interamente”, traces it almost entirely, making it binding where the circular allowed exemptions, Il Post reported, which adds that in practice little may change. It also sets a fine of €200 to €1,000 (about US$228 to US$1,140) for a covered face at school, with the parents paying for a minor, ANSA reported. President Sergio Mattarella has still to sign it, and he had said days earlier that the school is the most effective lever of integration.
What exactly has the European Union given Hungary, and is the money paid?
It is not paid. The European Commission proposed on Wednesday 23 September to unlock €4.2 billion (about US$4.79 billion) in regional aid frozen since 2022 and to restore access to the Erasmus+ exchange and the Horizon Europe research programme for students and researchers from universities maintained by Hungarian Public Interest Trusts. Péter Magyar’s government had notified new anti-corruption rules on 9 September. The Council of the European Union, where national governments sit, must approve the proposal within a month, Agence Europe reported, and Reuters put the wider total of frozen money at €16.4 billion (about US$18.70 billion).
Why is Poland handing out instructions for an air attack?
Its interior ministry published guidance on Friday 25 September on where to shelter and what to do outdoors or in a car, Notes From Poland reported. The same guidance counted 85,000 shelter points for 23.7 million people, or 64 per cent of the population. The immediate background is a Russian Mi-8 military helicopter that crossed about 350 yards into Polish airspace for 42 seconds on Wednesday, Stars and Stripes reported. Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski said multiple sources suggested that “Russia is planning something big this year”, while Estonia’s foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, said there are no indications of a looming Russian attack on NATO.

By The Rio Times | Created at 2026-09-25 19:21:40 | Updated at 2026-09-25 20:12:25
59 minutes ago








