Georgia appeals court to hear arguments in Fani Willis case on Friday

By Free Republic | Created at 2024-10-03 18:33:05 | Updated at 2024-10-06 18:20:48 3 days ago
Truth

Skip to comments.

Georgia appeals court to hear arguments in Fani Willis case on Friday
Fox5Atlanta ^ | 10/3/24 | Joyce Lupiani

Posted on 10/03/2024 10:47:54 AM PDT by CFW

FULTON COUNTY, Ga. - The Georgia Court of Appeals is set to review Judge Scott McAfee’s decision to deny a motion to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the high-profile election interference case involving former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants.

The motion, filed in January by Trump’s co-defendant and former White House staffer Michael Roman, sought to disqualify Willis due to an alleged improper relationship with former Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade. Roman’s motion also claimed that Willis financially benefited from the investigation and her connection with Wade.

[snip]

The Georgia Court of Appeals will not hear new evidence but will review previously presented materials to determine if McAfee’s ruling to keep Willis on the case was appropriate. The losing party will have the option to appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court, potentially further delaying the case from proceeding to trial.

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted in August 2023 for allegedly interfering in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election. While four co-defendants have reached plea deals, Trump and the remaining defendants have pleaded not guilty. Arguments before the appeals court are scheduled for tomorrow.

(Excerpt) Read more at fox5atlanta.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: elections; faniwillis; fultoncounty; trump

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

I don't know if there will be live streaming of this argument. If there is and I can find a link, I will post it here tomorrow morning.

1 posted on 10/03/2024 10:47:54 AM PDT by CFW


To: CFW

So all of the Trump lawfare cases seem to be ratcheting up again with about 30+ days out from the election. Just a coincidence I guess.


2 posted on 10/03/2024 10:52:05 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)


To: CFW

2 assassination attempts failed, so back to lawfare.


3 posted on 10/03/2024 10:56:07 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)


To: CFW

DEMs: "We *had* to steal the election because Trump is a criminal."

No sarcasm tag.

4 posted on 10/03/2024 11:00:40 AM PDT by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)


To: CFW

Don’t know who the judges are...but looks like Republican heavy..


5 posted on 10/03/2024 11:01:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (mY)


To: CFW

Roman’s motion also claimed that Willis financially benefited from the investigation and her connection with Wade.

If that's the "bar", she's gone. Of course she financially benefitted, the boyfriend was paying for extensive travel for her with his new found "job"

6 posted on 10/03/2024 11:03:26 AM PDT by 1Old Pro


To: CFW

Yet again: how is it that any county prosecutor can just decide to charge the President when they don’t like what he’s doing?

As far as “grand jury indictment”, that’s a joke. We all know about indicting the ham sandwich. A prosecutor can pull together a bunch of bums off the streets, hand them some per diem and get any kind of indictment needed.

In the case of Willis, she found a deranged child with wild eyes to be the jury foreman, who then admitted on national tv that she voted to indict Trump on political grounds. That alone should have resulted in the entire matter being dropped and a state level investigation of the grand jury selection should have been conducted.

The Presidency is not supposed to be omnipotent but it’s also not supposed to be subordinate to municipal lawfare. That’s ONE of the reasons Presidential immunity exists.


7 posted on 10/03/2024 11:21:31 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)


To: shanover

RE: Just a coincidence I guess.

In the Magic Christian, Ringo Starr and Peter Sellers find a ticket on their parked car. Starr first wonders if it’s really an “advert” but then they see it isn’t. As a policeman approaches.
Starr: Could be routine.
Sellers: Could be. Or it could be mere damnable harrassment.


8 posted on 10/03/2024 11:23:17 AM PDT by frank ballenger (so then let us set up a last agonizing, bloodcurdling howl, a screech of defiance, a war whoop! )


To: 1Old Pro

She should have been gone the day they found out about this “relationship”.
Why do the wheels of justice turn so very slowly in this country? Everyone knows what a weak, fraudulent case this is.


9 posted on 10/03/2024 11:27:10 AM PDT by Fireone ("and dumb & silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter." G. Washington 1783)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Read Entire Article