In Defense of Nation-States

By Free Republic | Created at 2024-09-29 12:58:49 | Updated at 2024-09-30 07:18:47 19 hours ago

In Defense of Nation-States
American Thinker ^ | 29 Sep, 2024 | J.B. Shurk

Posted on 09/29/2024 4:54:34 AM PDT by MtnClimber

A new globalist empire will suffer the same fate as all the empires of old.

Nationalism has become the great bugaboo of global talking heads today. It is discussed in the marbled halls of Western capitals as a scourge that must be eliminated just as swiftly as its equally detested cousin, populism. Policies that are popular with the people and nation-states that reflect the self-determination of the people cannot be permitted!

Who says? Some very important people who belong to august bodies such as the European Commission, the United Nations, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Economic Forum, and the World Health Organization. International groups with lofty reputations have no time to trifle with the beliefs and needs of discrete peoples. The globalists are here to save democracy by ridiculing and rejecting whatever the people might want!

Sounds a little bit like an absolute monarchy, does it not? The public is not in the mood for another round of COVID lockdowns. Who cares? — it’s what the WHO director commands! Citizens are extremely unhappy with the attendant crime, cultural conflict, and expanded welfare obligations that come with rampant illegal immigration. So what? — the unelected bureaucrats at the E.C. and the U.N. are committed to destroying national identities! Westerners demand an end to money-printing and runaway inflation. Who asked them? — we do what the multinational investment firms say!

What we have today are kings and queens who sit on distant thrones and bark orders at the common people living under their rule. Those who object to being ruled are condemned as “extremists,” vulgar “populists,” and bigoted “nationalists.” From the royalty’s point of view, anyone who represents the people is a threat to the globalist monarchy’s continuing reign. Populists and nationalists, you say? Egad, off with their heads!

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: globalism

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

1 posted on 09/29/2024 4:54:34 AM PDT by MtnClimber

To: MtnClimber

A revolt against the WHO can’t come too soon.

2 posted on 09/29/2024 4:54:45 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)

To: MtnClimber

If one believes in self determination there would be 5,000 separate countries based on the ethnic stuff. Everyone would be comfortable within their own enclave. Would it work?

3 posted on 09/29/2024 5:00:21 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET

To: MtnClimber

interesting world we live in where any group with enough money and power can attempt to start an institute of worldwide control and expect the masses to accept their dictates just because they say so. what will they do when the masses more than just refuse to follow but gets so sick and tired of their B.S. that a French Revolution style event will be required to shut them up? “headless politicians cannot make demands of their constituents” applies.

4 posted on 09/29/2024 5:13:36 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star)

To: MtnClimber

5 posted on 09/29/2024 5:29:31 AM PDT by PGalt ( Past Peak Civilization?)

To: MtnClimber

6 posted on 09/29/2024 5:30:08 AM PDT by PGalt ( Past Peak Civilization?)

To: DIRTYSECRET

Would it work? Yes it worked.

Sovereign, self determining, self defending, self supporting nation states worked from America’s founding until the civil war ended states rights. The civilians formed committees and general assemblies. The assemblies formed states. The states formed the confederation of states. The confederation formed the federal republic. The civilian government worked in our favor but not in the favor of the old world order.

The civil war was manipulated to put the old aristocracy back in control. The sovereign, civilian government of the southern states were REPLACED by Abraham Lincoln’s own appointments and military rule. He declared the first executive orders in history, the liebre code and martial law. This scheme of replacing civilian government worked so well it was quietly put in place for the entire nation. The American states were replaced with an incorporated “United States of America”. We have been kept under military law since then with military districts, district courts, school and postal districts, corporate elections and a military battle flag.

When Abraham Lincoln famously said “that government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth,” he had just killed it himself. It has been said after the war it was his intention to help us reconstruct the original civilian government - and that’s why “they” the old world order had him assassinated. The reconstruction never took place.

When we wave the flag of the United States we are unwittingly waving our fundamental rights and declaring military law in the area. The correct and lawful thing for us to do is raise the American Civil Peace Flag declaring peace, natural law and civilian control and finish the reconstruction by filling the seat of self government ourselves, notifying our replacements in D.C. that we are back and no longer require their governing services. All government agencies need to be dissolved and D.C. needs to be unincorporated and absorbed by the neighboring states.

Self government has worked. It will work.

Tagline.

7 posted on 09/29/2024 5:40:43 AM PDT by conservativeimage (Divorce the Deep State and Reconstruct Civilian Government: https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Read Entire Article