By Free Republic | Created at 2024-11-25 22:46:17 | Updated at 2024-11-27 16:36:49
1 day ago
Judge grants request from prosecutors to dismiss election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump
X ^
Posted on 11/25/2024 2:04:16 PM PST by janetjanet998
Judge grants request from prosecutors to dismiss election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: janetjanet998
To: janetjanet998
“Smith’s filing for dismissal “without prejudice” emphasized the temporary nature of the president’s prosecutorial immunity, leaving the door open to post-presidential prosecution – even of the same case. “
3 posted on 11/25/2024 2:07:23 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: janetjanet998
Jack avoided a dismissal with prejudice so he can run the same scam after Trump is out of office.
4 posted on 11/25/2024 2:07:29 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: kiryandil
seriously, so what, he can prosecute him again he leaves office
To: janetjanet998
"For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, ECF No. 282, the Government's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 281, is hereby GRANTED, and the Superseding Indictment, ECF No. 226, is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice," Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in a one-page order.
6 posted on 11/25/2024 2:09:31 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: Sarah Barracuda; E. Pluribus Unum; CFW
7 posted on 11/25/2024 2:10:09 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
jerk and sh*tcan both should be decorating trees...
8 posted on 11/25/2024 2:11:24 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: kiryandil
they want to hang this over his head along with the Marchan nonsense til AFTER his presidency ends
To: janetjanet998
Perhaps a stupid question. Is there a statute of limitations?
10 posted on 11/25/2024 2:16:26 PM PST by hanamizu ( )
To: kiryandil
If I remember correctly the federal statute of limitations for felonies is 6 years. They would not be able to refile until 8 years and a couple weeks from the alleged conduct. Not to worry— we’ve learned that the Statute of Limitations only applies to democrats like Hunter. Not applicable to republicans
11 posted on 11/25/2024 2:17:17 PM PST by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: Sarah Barracuda
Trump and his lawyers are gonna have to be very creative when crafting his own self-pardon 4 years from now: he’ll have to include this, for certain, but also any other nonsense they can dream up — just in case they choose to punish an 80+ year-old man for being awesome.
12 posted on 11/25/2024 2:17:54 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: hanamizu; Sarah Barracuda; j.havenfarm
13 posted on 11/25/2024 2:24:22 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: janetjanet998
NOT good enough. Smith must go to prison for treason.
14 posted on 11/25/2024 2:25:55 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: hanamizu
How does this impacts the hundreds of hostages the DoJ arrested and imprisoned?
15 posted on 11/25/2024 2:28:03 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Drill Baby Drill!)
To: janetjanet998
I thought that if you just say, “Forget about it”, you get to pick up the court costs.
To: Sarah Barracuda
Let’s grab Jack Smith’s passport while we’re at it.
17 posted on 11/25/2024 2:29:25 PM PST by Bullish (Socialism is a weed that blooms into communism, the tyranny that strangles liberty.)
To: Sarah Barracuda
GAME OVER
It won't be over until those depriving rights under color of law are prosecuted themselves.
Requesting a dismissal and getting is not the same as a dismissal with prejudice. They are free to bring charges up again if 4 years.
18 posted on 11/25/2024 2:31:28 PM PST by fruser1
To: Sarah Barracuda
Oh, no, no, no. It's not going to be that simple.
19 posted on 11/25/2024 2:32:02 PM PST by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How does he re-file later if he’s been fired?
20 posted on 11/25/2024 2:35:45 PM PST by Dr. Zzyzx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
