By The Rio Times | Created at 2025-01-30 11:43:21 | Updated at 2025-01-31 01:26:37
14 hours ago
The National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) recently unveiled its Quarterly Indicator of State Economic Activity (ITAEE). The report reveals a surprising shift in Mexico’s economic powerhouses.
Durango and Oaxaca have surged ahead, leaving traditional economic centers in their wake. Durango claimed the top spot with a solid 6.0% annual growth rate. The state’s success stems from its ability to attract major foreign investments.
Solarever poured 3,400 million pesos into a new solar panel factory. Meanwhile, Solarever Electric Vehicles (SEV) invested 6,800 million pesos in an electric car assembly plant.
These investments created a ripple effect throughout Durango’s economy. New jobs sprouted up, boosting local employment rates. The state’s film industry also experienced a renaissance.
Major streaming platforms like Amazon Prime and Netflix launched projects in the region. This diversification strengthened Durango’s economic foundation. Oaxaca secured second place with a robust 5.5% increase in economic activity.
The state’s growth story revolves around infrastructure development. Two major highway projects reached completion after years of construction. These new roads dramatically reduced travel times to popular tourist destinations.
Models of Economic Diversification in Mexico
The Isthmus of Tehuantepec project further bolstered Oaxaca’s economy. Federal investment in the port of Salina Cruz improved connectivity. Progress on the Interoceanic Train project stimulated the secondary sector.
These initiatives created a more business-friendly environment. Remittances played a crucial role in Oaxaca’s economic success. They account for over 4% of the state’s GDP.
The state also saw advancements in certified forestry enterprises. Fruit production, particularly grapefruit, pineapple, papaya, and mango, became more competitive.
However, not all states shared in this economic boom. Tabasco experienced a 6.7% annual decline. Campeche followed with a 4.5% drop. Sinaloa, Coahuila, and Nayarit also saw minor contractions.
These declines stem from various factors, including completed infrastructure projects and lack of economic diversification. The contrasting performances highlight the uneven nature of Mexico’s economic development.
Some states benefited from targeted investments and infrastructure projects. Others grappled with structural challenges and external pressures. Durango and Oaxaca’s success offers valuable lessons for other states.
Their focus on diversification and infrastructure development paid off. They leveraged local strengths to drive growth. This approach could serve as a blueprint for struggling regions.
Mexico’s economic landscape continues to evolve. The rise of Durango and Oaxaca challenges traditional notions of economic power centers.
It underscores the potential for growth in unexpected places. As Mexico moves forward, balancing regional development remains a key challenge for policymakers.
