North Carolina Appeals Court Rejects GOP Challenge – Will Allow Voters Who Never Lived in the US to Vote in the State, Rejects Request to Set Aside UOCAVA Votes
Gateway Pundit ^ | October 30, 2024 | Staff
Posted on 10/30/2024 8:02:26 AM PDT by Red Badger
A three-member appeals court rejected the GOP challenge to not process certain UOCAVA [Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act ] or overseas votes that come into the state this year.
Republicans argued that the current laws enable voters to forum shop where they want their vote to be counted despite never living in the state or even in the US.
This is the latest ruling that breaks down the integrity of the US election. Democrats will cheer this news.
The Hill reported:
North Carolina appeals court on Tuesday rebuffed the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) request to not process certain overseas ballots in the upcoming election unless the voter shows they were previously a resident of the key battleground state.
Republicans have filed challenges to overseas ballots in several key swing states as the voting bloc is no longer seen as reliably red, but the lawsuits have so far been rejected.
A three-judge panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Tuesday unanimously rejected the RNC’s appeal after a trial judge refused the party’s request for an intervention ahead of the upcoming presidential election…
…North Carolina’s rules enable citizens who have never lived in the United States to vote in the state, as long as they haven’t registered elsewhere and their parent or legal guardian was previously an eligible North Carolina voter.
As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier – Democrats have devised a brilliant plan to steal our election in 2024—and it’s really quite simple—and now, thanks to reporting by The Gateway Pundit and others, Republicans are waking up to this threat!
One month ago, Former U.S. Ambassador to Canada Bruce Heyman joined MSNBC’s Morning Joe and said overseas voters could be the deciding factor in battleground states in 2024.
Heyman appeared on Morning Joe to discuss the Democratic Party’s efforts to mobilize millions of American voters living abroad, highlighting the pivotal influence these overseas voters could have in battleground states, where close margins may decide the election’s outcome.
By telegraphing to the American people that they believe the key to winning our elections is getting 9 million individuals to vote for Kamala Harris from a pool of 2.4 million eligible overseas voters in total (according to the U.S. government FVAP website), Democrats essentially remove the shock value when it’s announced they only achieved a percentage of their goal when it’s revealed they received millions of new overseas votes.
Screenshot But as Patty McMurray previously reported at The Gateway Pundit:
“None of the so-called “9 million voters” Democrats claim they are trying to recruit will have to prove their identity or even provide a legitimate address for their past or present residence in the United States.”
This leaves the US with another significantly flawed election process and will lead to another questionable outcome.
Last month, the Gateway Pundit published the first investigative piece in a series explaining how easily our elections can be stolen without a trace.
According to Heather Honey at Verity Vote, the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) is a Federal law passed in 1986.
UOCAVA requires that the states allow members of the US Armed Forces, their family members, and US citizens who reside outside of the US to register and vote absentee in elections for Federal offices in a standardized format.
In our first article on UOCAVA Voters (Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act), we explained how both federal and Democratic Party websites allow online voters to register without verification of identity or citizenship status.
US Citizens in the USA who would like to register to vote must share the last four digits of their social security number and/or provide a driver’s license or state-issued ID, but UOCAVA voters can bypass the requirement to share the last four digits of their social security number and/or provide a driver’s license or state-issued ID.
The screenshot below shows how the Democrat Party website, much like the federal government’s website, registers UOCAVA voters to vote in US elections and allows the user to bypass the ID portion of the online registration process.
Screenshot UOCAVA opens the door to unlimited foreign citizens voting.
Here are a few additional details about UOCAVA voters who register to vote on the FAVP or Federal Voting Assistance Program application (a federal government website) or the Democrat-funded website VoteFromAbroad.org:
Applicants may choose any state or address they wish to vote in. No one verifies that these registrants ever lived at the address they list or that they have any connection to that state. Voters in most states receive and return their ballots via email, making chain of custody impossible for election inpsectors. Of course, this is neither safe or secure!
And Democrats are angry that The Gateway Pundit and others are shining a light on this process.
Submit additional information.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: ballotfraud; dirtyelections; electionfraud; northcarolina; riggedelections; uocava; votefraud; voterfraud
Dear FRiends, Our FReepathon Status:
For the time being, we will not be able to accept credit card donations, but our PayPal system still works, and of course mail-in donations still work fine.
By the way, it seems you don't need to have a PayPal account to use this feature. You can also donate by debit or credit card on the PayPal page.
Click here to donate by PayPal or credit/debit card
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you all very much, and God Bless you.
Jim and Chris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA)
1 posted on 10/30/2024 8:02:26 AM PDT by Red Badger
To: Red Badger
Given the VA ruling today this will not stand.
2 posted on 10/30/2024 8:03:19 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
To: Frank Drebin
SOUNDS LIKE SUCH “VOTERS” COULD REPEAT THIS ACTION IN NUMBER OF STATES..........
3 posted on 10/30/2024 8:05:59 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Red Badger
I can live abroad and here, and have both votes count!
4 posted on 10/30/2024 8:07:27 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Frank Drebin
I assume this will go to the North Carolina Supreme Court which is 6-1 R.
5 posted on 10/30/2024 8:08:46 AM PDT by laconic ( )
To: Frank Drebin
I was JUST going to ask about that. How fast can this be knocked down in NC?
To: ConservativeMind
Vote early and often! It’s the law!............/s
7 posted on 10/30/2024 8:09:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: laconic
OMG....VOTE FRAUD IS RAMPANT!!!
8 posted on 10/30/2024 8:11:07 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Red Badger
The three judges in the North Carolina Appeals Court need to be impeached and removed from office, then disbarred.
9 posted on 10/30/2024 8:12:08 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
To: spacejunkie2001
Happened very quickly with VA case, but as pointed out above, this nonsense will most likely not survive the NC Supremes.
10 posted on 10/30/2024 8:12:10 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
To: Carl Vehse
Helicopter rides for all.
11 posted on 10/30/2024 8:14:58 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Hospitals are the most dangerous place on Earth! Dr. David Williams)
To: All
Okay wait a minute.
A military member is not required to change residency when they are assigned to a new base. This is typical if that military person ever was stationed in Texas and its zero state income tax.
And so a military person on an NC base can vote there while all records of that person show they were never a resident, and this can remain so if that person is transferred overseas. “Residency” will be recorded as Texas, they spent time in NC (and it will never show up as such), and then go overseas and request an NC ballot.
This is not the overly horrible thing suspected.
12 posted on 10/30/2024 8:15:58 AM PDT by Owen
To: Red Badger
This will get a lot of attention here but its not a big deal. The numbers are relatively small. Service members do not choose North Carolina as their domicile. They choose states with no income tax.
13 posted on 10/30/2024 8:17:29 AM PDT by FLT-bird
To: Red Badger
All US citizens overseas should have a passport or military ID. Those would be better than “nothing”.
14 posted on 10/30/2024 8:17:58 AM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals)
To: Red Badger
I know I’m a broken record on the subject, but unless and until our side plays by the same rules as theirs, this crap will continue unabated.
15 posted on 10/30/2024 8:19:27 AM PDT by daler
To: ridesthemiles
The democrats have no legitimate way to win this election. They will cheat as much as they can. They are scumbags.
16 posted on 10/30/2024 8:22:03 AM PDT by Rdct29 (The Democrats Are The New Nazi Party e )
To: Red Badger
It is a serious error to involve courts in these matters, or to pay attention to “rulings” that they have no authority to issue.
In this case, appointment of electors is a reserved power of State Legislatures. Rules they make for this purpose cannot be “unconstitutional” unless they violate a specific Article or Amendment.
17 posted on 10/30/2024 8:23:09 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Owen
“This is not the overly horrible thing suspected.”
True.
18 posted on 10/30/2024 8:23:28 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
To: All
This is the proof that we've been telling you would happen and is for all of you that kept denying that this would happen because you said "there are laws to prevent this so why y'all freaking out."
There are no laws they won't break because there are no consequences for them but you better not try anything because there will be consequences.
19 posted on 10/30/2024 8:26:28 AM PDT by ssfromla
To: Red Badger
How can a voter be from NC if he/she has never lived there?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson