Opinion : Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s Trump-endorsed “DOGE” is a scam designed to protect other scammers

By Free Republic | Created at 2024-12-22 01:43:46 | Updated at 2024-12-24 01:57:14 2 days ago

Opinion : Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s Trump-endorsed “DOGE” is a scam designed to protect other scammers
NW Progressive ^ | 12.18.2024 | Marco Rosario Rossi

Posted on 12/21/2024 5:21:43 PM PST by libh8er

Musk and Ramaswamy are swamp creatures who want to lay waste to the federal agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that are working with great care to protect Americans from greed, graft, and unfairness.

Donald Trump’s so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) is a classic Orwellian institution. It isn’t a governmental department, nor is it designed to promote efficiency. A genuine executive department would require an act of Congress, including the ability to overcome the Senate filibuster.

Its leadership would also require senatorial approval, and — as in some cases — assurances that it can operate in a bipartisan manner.

These are all things that Trump obviously does not want.

Instead, the DOGE is nothing but a glorified advisory committee. Considering its leadership, none of its recommendations are likely to promote governmental efficiency.

What is expected to come out of the DOGE is a plan to weaken the federal government’s regulatory capacities, especially as it relates to the financial sector.

It is important to note that there is already a government agency — a real one! — that audits the federal government and recommends ways to cut waste: the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Originally titled the Government Accounting Office, the GAO was founded in 1921 as part of the Budget and Accounting Act, which also created the critically important Office of Management and Budget.

For the last century these agencies have coordinated the process of budget management and evaluated the effectiveness of government programs and agencies.

Recently, several of the GAO’s reports have concluded that many governmental agencies are not meeting their mission, but the main culprit behind these substandard results is not excessive regulations, but inadequate funding.

As an example, on February 12, 2024, the GAO released its report on the Internal Revenue Source’s (IRS) audit rates. It found that between 2012 and 2022, the agency closed 16,812 audits of taxpayers who made between $500,000 and $1 million, but only closed 2,933 audits of taxpayers who made over $10 million. Essentially, the wealthier a taxpayer was, the less likely that person would be audited.

The main reason for this discrepancy was that the IRS lacked the resources to challenge the potentially fraudulent tax filings of multimillionaires and above.

Biden attempted to address this issue by including new IRS funding in the bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act. Meanwhile, Trump has promised to repeal the law.

Such fair analysis is not part of the purview of the DOGE.

Rather, it is there to create an ideological patina for eliminating agencies that have been a target of conservatives, especially those agencies that could a hinder the ability of DOGE’s leadership to make money.

Recently, Elon Musk, one of two chairs of the DOGE, has called for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPB was formed in the aftermath of the Great Recession to ensure that banks could no longer engage in the type of widespread fraud — including flagrantly misleading consumers as to the terms of their mortgages — that led to the housing market crashing.

Musk’s animosity toward the CFPB is shared by his co-chair, Vivek Ramaswamy.

Ramaswamy, who describes himself as a “small-government crusader,” retweeted an article on Musk’s statement, writing “CFPB started under Elizabeth Warren less than twenty years ago, and consumers are no better off for its existence. Quite the contrary, actually.” Two days prior to his retweet, Ramaswamy posted a clip from billionaire and venture capitalist Marc Andreeesen, claiming that the CFPB was under the “personal control” of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D‑MA), that it got “to do whatever it wants,” and that it was responsible for major financial institutions “debanking” Trump supporters.

None of which is true.

In reality, the CFPB has been a critical agency defending everyday consumers against the abuses of the financial industry. Since its creation, the CFPB has saved Americans $17.5 billion, and imposed another $4 billion in civil penalties. The money from the civil penalties goes into a Victims Relief Fund, which provides compensation for consumers who were scammed by financial companies. This past year, the CFPB finalized rules that forced credit card companies to reduce their late fees from an average of $32 to $8.

The new regulations are expected to save Americans billions.

Most recently, the CFPB released a new rule that would regulate data brokers. Under the new regulations, data brokers would be classified as “consumer reporting agencies.” This means that they would be obligated to ensure the accuracy of their data, had to guarantee that users had access to their own data, and were prevented from selling personal data to unsavory clients. The move is likely to have immense downstream impacts in protecting average Americans. Indeed, organized criminals regularly buy or steal personal information from data brokers to target victims.

In one example, hackers were able to steal three billion records — including social security numbers — from an insecure data broker.

In another, a federal judge’s son was murdered by a man who tracked down his victim after freely purchasing his private information from a data broker.

Noteworthy, Musk’s statement against the agency comes less than a week after the CFPB finalized its regulatory rules regarding digital wallet apps.

The new rules grant the CFPB regulatory oversight over these apps in the areas of privacy, surveillance, errors, fraud, and termination of services. Musk has been vocal about the fact that part of the reason he purchased Twitter was to transform the social media platform into an “everything app,” which would allow digital wallet services.

Furthermore, only a month after Musk purchased Twitter, which he calls X, the social media platform had to pay a $150 million fine to the Federal Trade Commission for asking users for personal information with the stated purpose of securing their accounts, only to then use that information for targeted ads.

What Twitter did was illegal, but perhaps the more damaging aspect is the relationship that the platform has with its “service providers.”

It is likely that few Twitter users realize that by signing onto the platform, they forfeit their information to several data brokers, who — until recently, when the CFPB decided to regulate them — paid Twitter for that information with very little oversight.

Trump might adopt populist rhetoric, and holler against the “deep state,” but his policy objectives are clearly directed at benefiting America’s most wealthy.

The DOGE, headed by fellow billionaires Musk and Ramaswamy, isn’t designed to make the federal government work better for average Americans, who are right to expect that their hard-earned tax dollars are being used wisely. It’s the opposite. It is designed to de-legitimize any federal regulatory agency that interferes with the ability of companies to scam, swindle, and scrounge Americans out of their money.

TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: doge; musk; trump; vivek

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

1 posted on 12/21/2024 5:21:43 PM PST by libh8er

To: libh8er

Dumb assessment by a governmen lover.

2 posted on 12/21/2024 5:24:17 PM PST by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)

To: libh8er

Where's the denominator? To tell which is more likely, I have to know how many taxpayers there are between $500,000 and $1 million vs. how many over $10 million. Also consider the word "closed": once you get to a certain level of income you might just be perpetually audited and never fully closed, especially if you are politically unfavored.

3 posted on 12/21/2024 5:26:14 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Now unburdened by the Biden/Harris administration that has been.)

To: libh8er

These people worship government as gods.

They never consider the government agencies have their own special interests, serve detrimental government agendas, and often do much more harm than good.

4 posted on 12/21/2024 5:28:18 PM PST by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )

To: shanover

“Recently, several of the GAO’s reports have concluded that many governmental agencies are not meeting their mission, but the main culprit behind these substandard results is not excessive regulations, but inadequate funding.”

Inadequate funding? Why read the rest of the article?

5 posted on 12/21/2024 5:32:46 PM PST by Lake Living

To: libh8er

The entire “progressive” movement is a scam, so there’s that.

6 posted on 12/21/2024 5:34:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)

To: shanover

As usual for those commies.

7 posted on 12/21/2024 5:34:53 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)

To: libh8er

What a steaming pant load. I read about a quarter before I had to quit. I stopped at this extreme laugher:

For the last century these agencies (the GAO) have coordinated the process of budget management and evaluated the effectiveness of government programs and agencies.

Yeah, the GAO worked SO WELL that we have a $37 trillion debt and $2 trillion annual deficits from here to Doomsday.

When was the last time the government actually had a budget? Ten years? Twenty? Of course, the budget and the debt ceiling are meaningless and ineffective hokum only put in place to hoodwink the hoi polloi.

If the GAO truly "evaluated the effectiveness of government programs and agencies" it would have shut down two thirds of the God damned thing. The GAO does nothing but give its imprimatur to Congressional spending and grift. It's a tissue thin glossy veneer of lies that all is well in the government.

8 posted on 12/21/2024 5:35:04 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (Marxism is a politics for the ugly, unwanted, uneducated, unhealthy, and insane.)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

9 posted on 12/21/2024 5:35:07 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)

To: libh8er

” but only closed 2,933 audits of taxpayers who made over $10 million. Essentially, the wealthier a taxpayer was, the less likely that person would be audited.”

Or they don’t audit them because at this level cheating isn’t a thing. The risk/reward ratio is decidely lopsided.

It’s a massive waste of manhours and resources dealing with the topflight accountants and tax attorneys.

10 posted on 12/21/2024 5:35:20 PM PST by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)

To: libh8er

Government agencies are full of greed, graft, and unfairness to American taxpayers.

11 posted on 12/21/2024 5:36:43 PM PST by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)

To: marktwain

That’s because they’re useful idiots.

12 posted on 12/21/2024 5:36:50 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)

To: libh8er

The gist of all that sounds like your typical lefty screeching into the sky because he foresees his precious altars to government are about to be destroyed.

To: Valpal1

Or at that level they have a tax attorney as well as an accountant on retainer. They know the laws.

14 posted on 12/21/2024 5:38:18 PM PST by Fai Mao (The US government is run by pedophiles and Perverts for pedophiles and perverts)

To: mass55th

Fred, graft and unfairness is obviously a basic human tendency that permeates every institution.

15 posted on 12/21/2024 5:39:47 PM PST by Fuzz

To: cross_bearer_02

16 posted on 12/21/2024 5:40:08 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)

To: libh8er

“Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute’s uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.”

Wow, what a totally unexpected opinion piece from them! Right, DOGE is a scam. The DNC nominating Kamala, not a scam at all.

As usual, projection.

To: Valpal1

They do get audited a lot.

18 posted on 12/21/2024 5:40:29 PM PST by Degaston

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Read Entire Article