Panama Election Bill Raises Donation Caps as Critics Warn of Dirty Money

By The Rio Times | Created at 2026-09-28 16:31:56 | Updated at 2026-09-28 21:05:12 5 hours ago

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Brazil votes Sunday. The courts are deciding.”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

PANAMA · POLITICS

Key Facts

  • —The country Panama uses the US dollar and elects its president, National Assembly and mayors together. The next general election is due in May 2029.
  • —Why it matters Bill 699 rewrites the electoral code. Lawmakers changed the Electoral Tribunal’s draft to allow bigger private donations and slower campaign reporting.
  • —What happened On Monday 28 September, anti-corruption campaigner Olga de Obaldía told TVN the changes lower accountability and “open the door” to organised-crime money.
  • —The numbers Caps for deputies of US$300,000 to US$500,000 per candidate. Parties would get 90 working days, not 30, to file certain campaign accounts.
  • —What it means for you Nothing changes yet. The bill still needs two full Assembly debates and the president’s signature.
  • —Still open Whether the full Assembly reverses the money changes in second debate, and when that debate starts.

Panama campaign finance rules are now the sharpest point of dispute in the country’s electoral reform. Transparency advocates and a former election judge say lawmakers raised donation caps while weakening the checks on that money.

Free daily brief — no card needed

Get every Latin America story in one morning email

We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.

Yes, email me my free daily brief — I can unsubscribe any time.

The target is Bill 699, drafted by the Electoral Tribunal, Panama’s independent election authority. A National Assembly committee approved it in first debate last week by seven votes to two, after adding dozens of changes.

The Panama City skyline seen across the bay from the Cinta Costera waterfront, with a small fishing boat in the foregroundHigh-rise towers of Panama City seen across the bay from the Cinta Costera waterfront. (Photo: Ángel López, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons)

One-stop reference

Company Intelligence

Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.

Browse the directory →

“Not only the amounts”

Olga de Obaldía heads the Foundation for the Development of Citizen Freedom, which belongs to the Transparency International movement. “It is not only raising the amounts, it is lowering the standard of accountability,” she told TVN on Monday.

Her biggest fear, she said, is “dirty money” from organised crime or corruption. She added that her foundation’s monitoring found candidates who have still not filed reports, and gaps between declared donations and spending.

What the committee changed

Deputies Benicio Robinson and Luis Eduardo Camacho proposed caps on private donations scaled by the number of voters. Candidates for deputy could raise US$300,000, US$400,000 or US$500,000, according to TVN and La Estrella de Panamá.

La Estrella calculated that the tiers allow up to US$17.4 million across Panama’s 43 circuits. A flat US$300,000 limit per circuit would have allowed US$12.9 million.

TVN, which obtained the approved text, reported that parties would get 90 working days after the election to file certain campaign accounts. The Tribunal’s draft allowed 30.

The Panamanian Association of Business Executives (Apede) also objects that the window to prosecute electoral crimes shrinks from the four years the Tribunal proposed to three. La Prensa reported that election-period immunity from prosecution stays in place for all party leaders.

A former judge’s warning

Guillermo Márquez Amado, an Electoral Tribunal judge from 1990 to 1996, told La Estrella there was no justification for the increase. He called it a sign of the “greed” of career politicians.

Public or private money matters less than how it is policed, he argued. He also criticised the Electoral Prosecutor’s Office, which investigates election crimes, as too passive.

The committee vote followed a business backlash reported earlier in Panama Business Chamber Urges Lawmakers to Rethink a Rushed Election Bill.

What Is Not Yet Known

It is unclear whether the full Assembly will keep the Panama campaign finance changes, including higher caps and longer reporting deadlines. TVN and La Estrella said the second debate could begin this week, but by Monday afternoon there was no report that it had started.

The Panamenista Party plans a minority report asking to send the bill back to committee, La Estrella reported. Whether the Tribunal will challenge any article in the Supreme Court is also open.

Sources: TVN, 28 Sep 2026; TVN, 25 Sep 2026; TVN, 27 Sep 2026; La Estrella de Panamá, 24 Sep 2026; La Estrella de Panamá, 28 Sep 2026; La Estrella de Panamá, 28 Sep 2026; La Prensa, 26 Sep 2026.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map

See who really holds power in Latin America

Click to open the Power Map →

Read Entire Article