Perfect Biden-HARRIS Metaphor: Only Navy Oiler in ME Runs Aground, Springs Leaks

By Free Republic | Created at 2024-09-25 14:21:09 | Updated at 2024-09-30 21:34:42 5 days ago
Truth

Skip to comments.

Perfect Biden-HARRIS Metaphor: Only Navy Oiler in ME Runs Aground, Springs Leaks
Hot Air ^ | September 24, 2024 | Beege Welborn

Posted on 09/25/2024 7:01:21 AM PDT by george76

If there ever was a need for a poster child for the neglect and indifference that characterizes the Biden-HARRIS administration's attitude towards governance, someone now could easily slap up a picture of the USNS Big Horn.

The ship's sad story has all the elements that are now bedeviling the Americans it serves thanks to the malevolent, arrogant, indifferent clowns who currently rule over us.

Almost a year ago, I wrote something I headlined, "US Maritime Woes: God Forbid We Go to War." I was trying to shine a light on the utterly shameful, almost downright criminal neglect with which the Biden-HARRIS administration had treated our US Merchant Marine Fleet. It operates under the auspices of the US Maritime Administration (MARAD), which belongs to the Department of Transportation (aka Mayor Pete) - perhaps you're already beginning to sense part of the problem if you don't remember or haven't read the column.

The administration has an "admiral" named as head of MARAD, one RADM Ann Phillips, who has performed exactly as damn near any other Biden cabinet secretary, particularly Mayor Pete - they haven't seen her.

...Maritime matters were a priority during the GHW Bush years, but really got revved up during Trump’s term.

…During President Trump’s administration, Maritime Administrator Commandant Mark Buzby instigated a tidal wave of change. He allocated hundreds of millions of dollars for training ships, activated the entire ready reserve fleet in significant naval Turbo Activations, personally handled media inquiries, engaged with sailors nationwide, and attended major events as a headline speaker.

Biden’s current administrator, in contrast, has been so little engaged, she’s earned her own call-sign, and it’s not a compliment – “…who some call the Ghost Admiral.”

She's still in the post.

A crisis was afoot because there were not enough American merchant mariners to crew our US-flagged maritime fleet, and a plan had been floated to allow foreigners to provide a second deep-water US merchant marine fleet in time of war. While that was being argued - the US merchant union firmly against the proposal - a bombshell came from Maersk shipping.

...Against all this roiling in the background – with a completely disinterested, incompetent administrator (and administration) at the helm – word came at the end of September that Maersk, the largest shipping firm in the world, and the “principle transportation partner for the US military” was backing away from it’s DoD contracts. And picking up business from China.

…According to Hanley, Maersk executive interviewed by gCaptain today, the company plans to maintain its support and investment in container services and the US Maritime Security Program. However, it has already divested its critical tanker fleet and contracts to manage military grey hull ships. Maersk also was clear the recent divestiture of sale of assets received the approval of key military stakeholders including the US Maritime Administration (MARAD), Military Sealift Command (MSC) and the US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM).

How critical are those assets to the US Military? Very.

“The Department of Defense is projected to need on the order of one hundred tankers of various sizes in the event of a serious conflict in the Pacific,” said former Maersk executive Steve Carmel in a gCaptain editorial. “Not only does the U.S. lack the tonnage required to support a major conflict in the Pacific, it has no identifiable roadmap to obtain it.”

Oh, WELL DONE, GUYS. Go ahead, sell it – who needs tankers anyway? Not us.

I asked that rhetorically last year, and the Biden-HARRIS administration's "Ghost Admiral," Secretary Buttigieg, and neither the president nor his second in command seem to make it a priority.

We didn't have to wait for China to start something. Shifting assets to the Middle East that should be in the Pacific has brought the problem home much sooner.

The USNS Big Horn, the Navy oiler for the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group, ran aground yesterday off the coast of Oman and sprung a pretty decent leak.

Oh, wait - did I give you the impression it was one of the oilers for the carrier group?

Sorry about that.

IT'S THE ONLY OILER FOR THE ENTIRE CARRIER GROUP

...

Incredible…

“US Navy oiler USNS Big Horn ran aground yesterday, leaving the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Group without it’s primary fuel source. The Navy doesn’t have a spare oiler to deploy and is now scrambling to find a commercial tanker.”

...

Gosh darn, smack in the middle of Houthi shooties, and now the Navy has to go try to find a commercial gas truck?

Well, yeah - that's basically the problem here.

Way to go, Grampa and the Cackler.

They're not your kids floating out there - what do you care?

And how hard is this going to be? According to my maritime guru friend, Capt John Konrad, it's gonna be a major pain in the asterisk.

US Navy Oiler Runs Aground, Forcing Carrier Strike Group to Scramble for Fuel

...Compounding the problem is the fact that the Big Horn is the only oiler the Navy has in the Middle East. One shipowner told gCaptain that the Navy is scrambling to find a commercial oil tanker to take its place and deliver jet fuel to the USS Abraham Lincoln.

If the Navy resorts to using a commercial oil tanker as a temporary replacement, it would need to install a Consolidated Cargo Handling and Fueling (CONSOL) system for underway replenishment operations. This system includes specialized refueling rigs, tensioned fueling hoses, and high-capacity fuel pumps—all essential for safely transferring fuel to warships at sea. The tanker would also require robust communication and control systems to ensure precise coordination during refueling maneuvers.

This retrofitting process is no small feat. It requires significant modifications to the commercial vessel, enabling it to withstand the unique stresses and operational demands of pumping fuel while sailing at full speed. Moreover, a U.S. Merchant Marine crew trained in CONSOL UNREP procedures—a complex and high-risk operation—would need to be flown to the Middle East to supervise the operation. This adds another layer of complexity to an already challenging situation.

Commercial tankers are significantly slower than Navy oilers, which could leave the USS Abraham Lincoln more vulnerable to attack during aviation fuel loading operations.

Oh, well done Biden-HARRIS types!

If you have never seen a carrier - or even just a ship-to-ship - refueling operation, it is a pretty spectacular, precison maneuver at speed. This is nothing the crew on a commercial ship could pull off easily.

Navy vessels are hauling when they refuel, whatever the weather.

the Big Horn sustained damage including a ruptured rudder post and is being towed to Dubai.

The scramble is on for a replacement commercial tanker. And the long wait for new Navy oilers continues...

...The Navy currently faces a severe shortage of oilers and crew to operate them. Earlier this month, the Navy announced it might lay up 17 replenishment and supply ships—including one oiler—due to difficulties recruiting U.S. Merchant Mariners. While the Navy has launched five new John Lewis Class oilers – including the USNS Lucy Stone (T-AO 209) this week – and awarded NASSCO a $6.7 billion contract for eight more, challenges persist.

Official Navy and Military Sealift Command sources have repeatedly assured gCaptain that the John Lewis program is on schedule. However, two marine inspectors who have examined the new oilers tell gCaptain they’re encountering numerous problems, delaying the vessels’ overseas deployment. Despite the lead ship, USNS John Lewis, being launched in January 2021, it’s currently sitting idle at a repair shipyard in Oregon. As of today, none of the new oilers have been cleared to leave the continental United States.

...not that there seems to be any rush on the part of the current administration, even though one of the "new" ships has been in the water for three years.

It just breaks down so often that it can't leave the United States and a nearby boat garage. That's helpful.

Someone should ask Harris about that "Ghost Admiral."

See if she even knows she's got one.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: affirmativ; affirmativeaction; buttigieg; dei; die; diversity; ghostadmiral; navy; oiler; usnavy; usns; usnsbighorn; woke

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

1 posted on 09/25/2024 7:01:21 AM PDT by george76


To: george76

know a guy who does this. a good chap but fully woke.

sad.


2 posted on 09/25/2024 7:04:13 AM PDT by xoxox


To: george76

Do we dare ask who was the Captain and Executive officer of that ship?


3 posted on 09/25/2024 7:05:13 AM PDT by allendale


To: george76

I might have missed it, but I did look and havent found anything about the ships Captain. Seems that might be relevant given all the DEI of this admin.


4 posted on 09/25/2024 7:06:20 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )


To: george76

If we get into a war with France, I think we’d be OK.
But, in general, I don’t have confidence that the US could really win a war against anyone.


5 posted on 09/25/2024 7:10:06 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)


To: george76

When I was in the US Navy (mid-late 1960’s) some skippers of aircraft carriers had held prior commands on fleet oilers. If that is still the progression protocol, there is no joy in the captain’s cabin of the USNS Big Horn.


6 posted on 09/25/2024 7:12:32 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)


To: george76

Have read elsewhere that of America’s 11 carriers, only max. 3 can be put to sea at any one time.


7 posted on 09/25/2024 7:13:08 AM PDT by PGR88


To: george76

WOW! Don’t we have a couple de-comd ships that could be brought back on line faster than a new build? Probably not. Anyway, back in the early 60’s my dad was the supply officer for CINCLANTFLT stationed in London. Guess this would have been on his desk.


8 posted on 09/25/2024 7:14:37 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)


To: PGR88

CVNs spend year in the shipyard for every 5 years of service ( roughly )


9 posted on 09/25/2024 7:19:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)


To: george76

The Navy currently faces a severe shortage of oilers and crew to operate them

You mean young men whom can pass the ASVAB and have a modicum of fitness aren’t fighting their way to the recruiting office, hoping for a chance to service, I mean serve aboard the USS Harvey Milk?

10 posted on 09/25/2024 7:19:39 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Read Entire Article