Scandals, schism and decay: is the Church of England doomed?

Emphasis added. You have to scroll down quite a bit to get to that part, but it seems to me *that* is the story.

The religious divide of today is Sodomy versus non-Sodomy, not any of the issues that beguiled Christendom in the time of the Reformation.

The C of E (because is it the "established" church) will not go against the interests of their ruling class. So Sodomy it is.
I spell sodomy with a capital-S because it is the name of a religion.

Sarah Mullally, the Bishop of London. Probable next Archbishop of Canterbury.

Did I see her behind the counter last time I renewed my driver's license? { snicker }

The “Church” (lol) of England was born from murderous pig Henry’s TESTICLES. Literally... Henry’s nads.

It never was legitimate.

Of course it’s going under.
Any sect started so that a king could divorce and kill his ex is doomed from the start.
It’s Catholic light.

We see this weakness in most Christian denominations today. The actual words of Christ take a backseat to the latest woke fads. The future ain’t looking so good here.

Meanwhile Islam continues on in its march.

--- "Sodomy it is. I spell sodomy with a capital-S because it is the name of a religion."

It and the associated perversions are a religion, infecting the body politic and whole denominations. Romans 1 still applies.

“Eyden argues that the CofE’s position on homosexuality is a major part of the problem, suggesting that abusers such as Smyth are often acting on repressed desires. “If the church had an affirmative attitude to the many gay people among its most faithful followers, it would make warped sexual expression much less likely,” he says. “If gay sex is always sinful, the church will continue to produce either neurotics or monsters.”

“Abuse cases continue to mount up and evidence to the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse has found that 70 to 80 per cent of victims are male”.

“All agree that more vigilance is needed but liberals such as Eyden argue that the deeper solution to much of the abuse is more fundamental: support and bless gay relationships”.

And right there is the problem. They are spiritually blind. They don’t get it.

It and the associated perversions are a religion, infecting the body politic and whole denominations. Romans 1 still applies.

Someone else gets it. ;)

It is most interesting, when I ask the proponents of sodomy and related perversions to explain their “Christian” interpretation of Romans 1. Such resentment at the question. Such anguish at attempting to dismiss it. Such contradiction as they try to rationalize their stance in light of the text. Such confusion that Christian scripture so obviously contradicts their “Christian” advocacy of sodomy and related perversion.