Try this on for size: Massachusetts law restricts cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Part of the justification for this, they say, is avoiding “family separation.” Yet the same state has just separated a family — stealing a daughter from her parents. And why?
After the girl’s school “socially transitioned” her without her parents’ knowledge or consent, the devout Catholic couple objected. In thrall to “transgender” ideology, Massachusetts then kidnapped the girl, insisting that her “transition” must be supported.
In other words, it’s problematic to transition an illegal alien back to his home country. But you must “transition” your daughter into a boy if she suffers from the delusion she should be male. (This is despite such a transformation’s impossibility.)
The kicker: Massachusetts reportedly is now seeking court approval to give the girl high-dose testosterone. This would, of course, permanently distort her femininity and cause irreparable harm.
Anatomy of an Abduction
RedState reported on the story Monday, writing:
It’s an insane state of affairs indeed when a state can step in and yank a teenage girl out of her home, can block the girl’s parents and older brother from seeing or speaking with her, all because the family’s faith precludes them from acknowledging her school-prompted “transgender” status and because they refused to call her a boy.
Here is a transcription of a Fox News video report on the travesty (as provided by RedState):
[Fox News reporter] Lauren Green: … Joseph and Arlene Kutzko haven’t spoken to their daughter since the end of 2024, after the Department of Children and Families (DCF) removed her from their home. The family claims it was because of their Catholic faith, that would not allow them to affirm their daughter as a boy. An emotional Joseph Kutzko reading the birthday card his daughter Sophie gave him in October of 2024.
Joseph Kutzko: “Without you, I would have nothing,” [the daughter wrote]. “So it’s wholeheartedly, fully, sincerely, I love you with no end.”
In other words, this doesn’t sound like an abusive situation. Fox continued:
Lauren Green: Less than three months later, Child Services removed Sophie from their home and accused them of abuse. The Kutzkos say their daughter’s school, Algonquin Regional High School, in Southborough, Massachusetts, exposed Sophie to a culture steeped in gender ideology, and blame a school counselor for socially transitioning their daughter to becoming a boy without their knowledge or permission. They claim the counselor contacted Child Services. The school had no comment regarding the allegation.
Vernadette Broyles, attorney for the Kutzkos: You start with school policies that refuse to inform parents when a child rejects their sex and claims another identity. That’s part of a system that starts everything down the rabbit hole. Now in this case, the school then reported these parents … to DCF. So there was a direct school to DCF pipeline in this case as we have seen elsewhere.
Lauren Green: So DCF has assumed guardianship of their daughter. A permanent restraining order remains in place against Arlene and Joseph and Sophie’s older brother. The father and mother are distraught.
Arlene Kutzko: Mama missed you. Please come home. Mama miss you, please. I’m begging you, please.
Lauren Green: We reached out to DCF for comment, but they have not yet responded. Last Friday, a judge temporarily blocked the state from giving Sophie a high dose of testosterone, and the next court date is October 29th.
The video report is below.
A Massachusetts family says the state took custody of their teenage daughter after they refused to affirm her as a boy, citing their Catholic faith.
The parents allege a school counselor socially transitioned their daughter without their knowledge, then reported them to the… pic.twitter.com/cpHWhMHTXb
The notion that not supporting a child’s opposite-sex delusions is “abuse” is leftist dogma. It’s much like the “Silence is violence” claim: It’s not enough to simply avoid opposing woke ideology. You must actively voice support for political correctness or you’re a transgressor.
Destroying Souls
As already indicated, sexual-distortion treatments (SDTs, euphemistically called “gender-affirming care”) induce body-rending, often permanent changes. They’ve already left a path of destruction, too. There were teens “Nathaniel” (last name withheld), who had “bottom surgery”; and Chloe Cole, who had “top surgery.” Even more egregiously, Clementine Breen was prescribed puberty blockers at age 12 and, unbelievably, a double mastectomy at 14. These youths later regretted their decisions, but it was too late — they were scarred for life.
(Note: A multitude of other such stories can be found at SexChangeRegret.com.)
The same mutilation may be visited on the Kutzkos’ daughter, too — if she’s not rescued from state-abductor clutches. Moreover, the secret-MUSS-indoctrination phenomenon isn’t confined to one Bay State district. Just consider the following illustrative tweets.
(Note: The below concerns a different Massachusetts district than the Kutzkos’.)
And it’s happening in Alaska, too:
So, now, a question for naysayers: Do you still think this is all just a “conspiracy theory”?
Hypocrisy
Then there’s a gross contradiction here. Minors may not have a nose job or other cosmetic surgery without parental consent. And imagine they had Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID)? This is when a person is convinced that a body part(s) — eyes, an arm, legs, etc. — doesn’t belong on or in his body, and cannot tolerate it/them being there. (Some quack doctors have performed amputations on this basis, too.) A state government would never facilitate a BIID-based removal of a child’s legs against the parents’ wishes. Yet it will facilitate the removal of what’s between a child’s legs against the parents’ wishes. Is this rational?
Why, a minor can’t generally even be given an aspirin by school officials without parental permission. That minor could, however, be given a body-mutilation life sentence in blue-state America, Massachusetts being a case in point.
In a saner world, the state’s DCF officials would be arrested — they are child abusers of the worst sort.
