Trump Isn’t Ruling Out Using Economic or Military Coercion to Claim Greenland and Retake the Panama Canal

By Free Republic | Created at 2025-01-08 05:04:21 | Updated at 2025-01-08 22:05:18 17 hours ago
Truth

Skip to comments.

Trump Isn’t Ruling Out Using Economic or Military Coercion to Claim Greenland and Retake the Panama Canal
Liberty Daily ^ | January 7, 2025 | Emel Akan

Posted on 01/07/2025 8:44:46 PM PST by deks

President-elect Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he would not rule out the possibility of using military or economic coercion to take control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, emphasizing their strategic significance to U.S. national security.

Speaking at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump said that he “cannot assure” that military or economic coercion would not be used to take control of these two strategic locations, in response to a question.

“No, I can’t assure you on either of those two, but I can say this, we need them for economic security,” Trump responded.

“It might be that you’ll have to do something. Look, the Panama Canal is vital to our country. It’s being operated by China. We gave the Panama Canal to Panama. We didn’t give it to China, and they’ve abused it. They’ve abused that gift.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: greenland; nationalsecurity; panamacanal; straighttalk
Click The Pic
Hey! FReepers!
Help Fill The Tank!
How About It? Huh?
It Ain't Askin' Too Much
Ya Know....

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

President Trump said, “They laugh at us because they think we’re stupid, but we’re not stupid anymore. So the Panama Canal is under discussion with them right now."

President Trump also said the United States needs Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, for “national security purposes.”

“People have been talking about it for a long time. You have approximately 45,000 people there,” President Trump said.

“They should give it up, because we need it for national security. That’s for the free world. I’m talking about protecting the free world.

1 posted on 01/07/2025 8:44:46 PM PST by deks


There are other options. Sourced by Grok2...

<<>> Besides the 50 United States, what are the alternate political entities that are associated with the U.S.?

Besides the 50 states, several alternate political entities are associated with the United States. These entities have different levels of political autonomy, with some having their own constitutions and local governments, while others depend more heavily on U.S. federal oversight for governance and administration. The relationship between these territories and the U.S. varies, primarily defined by legal frameworks like the Insular Cases for territories and specific Compacts of Free Association for the associated states.

Territories:
The U.S. maintains jurisdiction over several territories, which are not part of any state.

These include:
Puerto Rico - Often referred to as a commonwealth, it has a unique status with significant internal self-governance but is under U.S. sovereignty.

Guam - An organized, unincorporated territory in the Pacific Ocean.

U.S. Virgin Islands - An organized, unincorporated territory in the Caribbean.

American Samoa - An unorganized, unincorporated territory in the South Pacific.

Northern Mariana Islands - An organized, unincorporated commonwealth in political union with the U.S.

Minor Outlying Islands - Various uninhabited islands scattered across the Pacific and Caribbean.

Freely Associated States:
These are sovereign nations in free association with the U.S., meaning they have entered into compacts that give the U.S. certain responsibilities, particularly in defense and economic assistance:

Federated States of Micronesia
Marshall Islands
Palau

Federal District:
Washington, D.C. - Not a state but a federal district where the nation’s capital is located. It has its own local government, but its residents have limited representation in Congress.


2 posted on 01/07/2025 8:45:14 PM PST by deks (Deo duce, ferro comitante · God for guide, sword for companion)


To: deks

Hasn’t Panama broken the agreement with the US over the canal?
If so, the use of force could be justified.

We shouldn’t use force on Greenland. We should just buy them.
Offer the citizens $1 million each if Greenland vote to join the US. 57,000 citizens = $57 billion.


3 posted on 01/07/2025 8:50:04 PM PST by DannyTN


To: deks

President Trump is just shooting spitballs at China to let them know we’re watching them.


4 posted on 01/07/2025 8:52:30 PM PST by captmar-vell


To: deks


To: CondoleezzaProtege

6 posted on 01/07/2025 8:56:02 PM PST by deks (Deo duce, ferro comitante · God for guide, sword for companion)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Read Entire Article