Trump Shouldn’t Hire Kristi Noem, Or Anyone Else, To Run DHS. He Should Abolish It
Federalist ^ | November 13, 2024 | John Daniel Davidson
Posted on 11/14/2024 4:24:58 AM PST by george76
DHS was supposed to protect us from foreign terrorist attacks. Instead it has become an instrument of censorship and propaganda...
News broke Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump picked South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to lead the Department of Homeland Security, a key cabinet post for the incoming administration.
Conservatives are unhappy about the possibility — and rightly so. Noem is a terrible choice for any post in the Trump administration.
Trump won in part because he stood against the transgender agenda and pushed back against gender-confused boys competing in girls’ sports. Noem backed down from protecting girls in her state when the trans lobby came calling, then lied about it, then whined about conservative “cancel culture” when she was called out. She’s a coward and liar, and should be the last in line for a big cabinet post.
Noem was also one of the first governors in 2020 to accept Somali and other refugees without proper vetting, hardly a choice that recommends her to head up DHS. And, for what it’s worth, she awkwardly lied about having met North Korean dictator King Jong Un and about canceling a scheduled meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron.
All that said, the debate over whether Noem or someone else should run DHS is missing the forest for the trees. No one should run DHS because the entire department should be abolished. Trump rightly pledged to abolish the Department of Education in part because it’s been a failure. Well, not only has the Department of Homeland Security been a failure, it’s been worse than a failure. DHS was created after 9/11 for the explicit purpose of making Americans safe from foreign terrorist attacks, but it has turned out to be an instrument of domestic tyranny, a giant panopticon of surveillance trained on American citizens that serves no purpose except to censor, spy, and propagandize the very people it was meant to protect.
In hindsight, it should have been obvious that the wrong response to 9/11 was the creation of a vast surveillance and security apparatus, for the simple reason that it would eventually be turned on American citizens, as indeed it has been. All the technology, programs, and personnel dedicated to detecting and interdicting jihadist terror plots would instead go toward policing speech and surveilling law-abiding Americans.
Take for example the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Administration (CISA), which is housed within DHS and has been called the “nerve center” of government censorship — with good reason. It was originally created in 2007 during the second George W. Bush administration as the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), charged with reducing and eliminating threats to critical physical and cyber infrastructure. In 2018 under Trump, CISA was created as the successor agency to the NPPD, and its mission was expanded to assist other government agencies and private sector organizations in addressing cybersecurity threats.
It didn’t take long for CISA to start meddling in elections and suppressing free speech. In 2020, it was the foremost government agency attacking “disinformation” and “misinformation,” which turned out to mean anything the government happened to disagree with. The Twitter Files revealed just how extensive CISA and other federal agencies were involved in censorship efforts ahead of the 2020 election, deputizing Twitter and other social media platforms to police online speech in what amounted to a workaround of the First Amendment.
Here at the Federalist, we’ve reported extensively on how CISA has pressured Big Tech to censor Americans, worked with states to throttle election speech, and essentially served as the lynchpin of the censorship industrial complex over the past five years. It was at the heart of a federal censorship operation during the 2020 election cycle, together with the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), that targeted our own Mollie Hemingway and Sean Davis, colluding with Stanford University to pressure Big Tech firms to censor prominent conservative voices it deemed were spreading “disinformation.”
For the abuses of CISA alone, DHS deserves to die. But abolishing DHS wouldn’t mean that we would no longer have Border Patrol or ICE or Customs and Border Protection anymore. We had immigration and border security agencies before DHS (as part of the Immigration and Naturalization Service), and we could have them after it’s gone. Arguably, immigration and border security deserve their own department, whose head reports directly to the president. Protecting against foreign terrorist attacks can go back to being the job of the Pentagon.
It doesn’t matter what the agency or office’s name is, so long as it doesn’t have the power to surveil and censor Americans, meddle in our elections, and co-opt Big Tech into trampling the First Amendment. DHS has proven incapable of that, and it needs to be abolished.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Dear FRiends, Please use this temporary link to donate by credit card via Authorize.Net:
Or click here to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Hopefully, we'll have our normal CC system up and running again soon. Thank you very much for your loyal support!
1 posted on 11/14/2024 4:24:58 AM PST by george76
To: george76
2 posted on 11/14/2024 4:28:39 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: george76
To: george76
I totally agree that it should be abolished along with a bunch of other agencies.
But someone needs to manage the deconstruction...
move the offices to the south pole
make the offices 4x4 spaces with no windows, no electronics, no comms
4 posted on 11/14/2024 4:30:59 AM PST by SisterK (it's controlled demolition)
To: ifinnegan; thinden; RitaOK
No more DHS would be nice.
The sticking point is, who then would administer the Patriot Act...an actual Law passed by Congress.
It doesn’t go away, it just gets reassigned.
5 posted on 11/14/2024 4:31:12 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (When I say "We" I speak of, -not for-, "We the People")
To: george76
Remember: Trump isn’t even in office yet.
6 posted on 11/14/2024 4:32:30 AM PST by piytar (Remember Ashli Babbitt, Rosanne Boyland, and Corey Comperatore!)
To: george76
That may be the plan BTW...to abolish it. Which is why he picked someone like Noem (just to be a distraction until it’s gone).
7 posted on 11/14/2024 4:34:00 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson paraphrased, "If you strike at the king, don't fail." They failed. )
To: ifinnegan
I agree 100% this is a waste of government money. Cue in Pravda with sob stories of purple haired freaks that are now unemployed…
8 posted on 11/14/2024 4:35:01 AM PST by mikelets456
To: george76
I agree. Get rid of it. It’s just another arm of the ever increasing ‘1984 style’ police state.
The big brother government just keeps getting bigger and bigger and bigger.
9 posted on 11/14/2024 4:36:25 AM PST by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
To: george76
[Trump Shouldn’t Hire Kristi Noem, Or Anyone Else, To Run DHS. He Should Abolish It]
After experiencing the blatant idiocy of trying to get hired to a very low-level position, I agree.
A complete pain in the neck of incompetence and idiocy.
I’m a drug-free natural-born American citizen that worked for the USMCR and another federal agency and did consulting for another. They couldn’t get anything done for me. It was ridiculous. I told them to forget it.
Get rid of it.
10 posted on 11/14/2024 4:37:36 AM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: george76
Move the current employees to police departments and/or border patrol.
11 posted on 11/14/2024 4:37:47 AM PST by Churchillspirit (Pray for President Trump)
To: george76
I'm a huge fan of Christie Noem, of the DHS not so much.
I expect Noem to fully overhaul the agency, purging its dead wood, amputating unnecessary functions, if not to preside over the department's abolition.
12 posted on 11/14/2024 4:39:15 AM PST by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
To: george76
DHS is like a big, ferocious dog that turns on it’s master.
13 posted on 11/14/2024 4:39:49 AM PST by DocRock
To: SaveFerris
maybe her job is to turn the lights off
14 posted on 11/14/2024 4:40:14 AM PST by SisterK (it's controlled demolition)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
The so-called Patriot Act should have been called what it really is....the “Government Surveillance Act”.
15 posted on 11/14/2024 4:40:41 AM PST by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson