Why Man Utd's Lisandro Martinez was not shown a red card against Chelsea

By 90min | Created at 2024-11-03 21:01:19 | Updated at 2024-11-05 07:59:56 1 day ago
Truth

"There are 75,000 people waiting and millions watching at home," Ruud van Nistelrooy warned, trying to add another layer of importance to Manchester United's Premier League meeting with Chelsea at Old Trafford on Sunday afternoon

Almost every single one of those spectators were united in their surprise at the referee's decision not to show Lisandro Martinez a red card. The Argentine centre-back had the ball knocked over his head in the closing stages of a tepid 1-1 draw by Cole Palmer and scraped his studs across the playmaker's kneecap.

The on-pitch official Robert Jones initially tried to play advantage before bringing the game back for a free kick near the halfway line. Jones booked Martinez, a surprising decision which was even more unexpectedly backed up by VAR Michael Salisbury at Stockley Park.

Lisandro Martinez, Cole Palmer

Lisandro Martinez (centre) tangled with Cole Palmer / Michael Regan/GettyImages

Palmer had little joy on Sunday afternoon, only peppering the contest with some delightful touches rather than dominating proceedings. Chelsea's ephemeral talisman saved a lovely flick for second-half stoppage time, sending the ball in a perfect parabola over the head of an onrushing Martinez, like a matador whipping his cape away from a charging bull.

Unfortunately for Palmer, he didn't dodge Martinez's horns. United's centre-back stretched out his boot but was nowhere near the ball when he made contact with his opponent's knee. This wild lunge was judged by the VAR to have been "a reckless challenge and not serious foul play" according to the Premier League's official Match Centre X account.

As outlined in Law 12 of the FA Handbook, "serious foul play" - the threshold for a red card - is defined as "a tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality".

A "reckless" challenge is "when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent".

Ultimately, this is a subjective decision which could quite easily have gone either way. There is every chance that had Jones shown Martinez a red card on the pitch, VAR would not have overruled that decision.

Reaction to Lisandro Martinez's challenge on Cole Palmer

Sky Sports pundit Roy Keane was initially reluctant to wade in on Martinez's lunge, but did concede that the Argentine was "a lucky boy". "If he got sent off, there could be no complaints," the former United midfielder shrugged.

Those on social media reacted rather more strongly.

Disgusting tackle from Martinez and disgusting decision from the officials.

— Simon Phillips (@siphillipssport) November 3, 2024

That’s a red all day on Martinez 🤬
Scandalous challenge

— Jody Morris (@JodyMorris) November 3, 2024

📸 - Not a red card for Martínez, well done by VAR. pic.twitter.com/bZ8JYxYLIn

— 𝐀𝐅𝐂 𝐀𝐉𝐀𝐗 💎 (@TheEuropeanLad) November 3, 2024

This is football discourse after all, so not everyone was in agreement.

Sky replaying the Chelsea "penalty claim" where Martinez doesn't touch the player about 20 times but the studs up, dangerous challenge on Rashford in the box has just been glossed over. @GNev2 sort it out FFS. It's embarrassing.

— Doc (@Doc_Joshi) November 3, 2024

Neville begging for a red for Martinez....he slipped in to the tackle. Maybe listen to Howard Webb instead of dipping biscuits in your tea

— Mark Goldbridge (@markgoldbridge) November 3, 2024

READ THE LATEST PREMIER LEAGUE NEWS, RUMOURS & GOSSIP

Read Entire Article