Lindsay Clancy holdout juror reveals ‘tense’ moments during deliberations — but insists he had no reasonable doubt

By New York Post (U.S.) | Created at 2026-10-14 18:22:04 | Updated at 2026-10-15 21:03:05 1 day ago

See more of our coverage in your search results.

The lone holdout juror at Lindsay Clancy’s triple murder trial said there were “tense” moments during deliberations — but he insisted he had no reasonable doubt of her guilt.

Michael Desronvil denied other jurors’ claims that he had reasonable doubt but still refused to find the 36-year-old mom not criminally responsible for strangling her three kids.

Desronvil answered, “No” when he was asked by Fox News’ Kayleigh McEnany if he had reasonable doubt.

Lindsay Clancy, in a wheelchair, is pushed by a law enforcement officer in court.

“…I had a lot of evidence to back up my claim but because out of respect of the other jurors and the court system I will put that to sleep for now until you know they go through the process of the court system,” he said.

A new trial date has yet to be set and prosecutors still haven’t said whether they intend to bring the same charges of first-degree murder against Clancy for a second time.

Here’s the latest on Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial

Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, asked the jury to find her not guilty by reason of insanity on the grounds she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and hallucinated a man’s voice telling her to kill the kids and herself.

Prosecutors, on the other hand, claimed Clancy carefully plotted and carried out the slayings of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, on Jan. 24, 2023.

The panel of nine women and three men deliberated for seven days before a judge finally declared a mistrial after the jury sent out three notes that they were hopelessly deadlocked.