Mariah Carey trades her signature sparkles for $850 dirt-stained jeans and grungy layered tee

By Page Six | Created at 2026-09-10 16:18:20 | Updated at 2026-09-14 22:34:30 4 days ago
Mariah Carey dressed uncharacteristically grungy for a night out in Manhattan Thursday. BlayzenPhotos / BACKGRID

Diva by night, dirtbag by day.

Mariah Carey ditched her diamonds for distressed denim on a New York City outing Thursday, smiling for photographers as she left the Peninsula hotel’s rooftop bar.

The “Honey” hitmaker, 57, styled Acne Studios’ $850 baggy jeans — “finished with hand-applied paint and stain marks for an authentic dirty effect” — with the Swedish brand’s layered mesh tee ($580), its front scrawled with Sharpie-like doodles.

The 57-year-old singer stepped out of the Peninsula hotel’s rooftop bar in Acne Studios’ $850 baggy jeans. BlayzenPhotos / BACKGRID
The jeans arrive “finished with hand-applied paint and stain marks for an authentic dirty effect,” per the brand. BlayzenPhotos / BACKGRID
She styled the jeans with a $580 Acne mesh tee with graffiti-style doodles across the front. BlayzenPhotos / BACKGRID

The accessories were more familiar territory for the queen of glam: Gucci oval-frame sunglasses ($430) and Hermès platform slip-on sandals ($1,000).

Waist-length honey-colored curls, glossy lips and a metallic manicure and pedicure rounded out the ensemble.

Carey isn’t the only songstress to try the scruffy jeans on for size. Jennifer Lopez wore an identical pair during an April 2024 walk around New York, back when they cost $620.

Given the two pop stars’ history, it’s likely the homage was accidental. Carey famously told a German interviewer “I don’t know her” when asked about Lopez in 2003, and doubled down on the sentiment last October on “Watch What Happens Live.”

“How could I suddenly know [her], you know?” she quipped to Andy Cohen.

Jennifer Lopez wore the same distressed Acne pair around New York in April 2024, then priced $620. GC Images
Carey famously quipped “I don’t know her” about Lopez in a 2003 interview, doubling down on the sentiment last year. JosiahW / BACKGRID
Earlier in the week, she looked true to form in a $4,500 Louis Vuitton dress and $2,300 Gucci boots. Best Image / BACKGRID

Thursday’s dressed-down detour was an outlier in an otherwise typically glossy week. On Tuesday, Carey cut a more familiar figure in a Gucci logo minidress and high-heeled suede boots, changing into a $4,500 Louis Vuitton fit-and-flare dress and $2,300 canvas Gucci boots — again covered in the brand’s double-Gs — for dinner at Midtown staple Il Tinello.

The outings come ahead of the Oct. 30 release of her “Glitter” 25th anniversary reissue — the 2001 soundtrack’s first vinyl pressing since its original release, with previously unheard vault recordings included.

The album initially flopped alongside its critically maligned film, only to be reclaimed by fans in the years since as an underrated deep cut.

Welcome to the Page Six Community!

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.

In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.

Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will/might be rejected if it contains:

  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author

User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across.
  • 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions!
  • Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Read Entire Article