By American Renaissance | Created at 2024-11-23 00:08:50 | Updated at 2024-11-23 04:25:26
4 hours ago
The Illinois Supreme Court that overturned Jussie Smollett’s conviction today made the ‘disappointing’ ruling off the back of a wave of controversial decisions.
In just the past two years, the seven-member court has eliminated cash bail for criminals in Illinois and upheld a ban on assault weapons in the state, soft-on-crime rulings that angered conservatives.
In the former, the justices ruled that monetary bail is not ‘the only means to ensure criminal defendants appear for trials or the only means to protect the public’, in a move seen in several other Democrat-led states that has drawn scrutiny.
The weapons ban from August 2023 came as the state Supreme Court decided that despite the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, a ban on assault weapons would not be unconstitutional.
Although the ban received support from top Democrats including Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a federal judge stepped in this week and overturned it – as they slammed the court for impacting ‘tens of millions of law-abiding United States citizens.’
Criticism of the Illinois Supreme Court has now reached fever pitch in the wake of its ruling overturning Smollett’s conviction for lying to the police over a bizarre anti-Trump hoax.
The special prosecutor in Smollett’s case, U.S. Attorney Dan Webb, told DailyMail.com in a statement that the ruling completely ignored the evidence he presented, and he was ‘disappointed’ as it ‘had nothing to do with Mr. Smollett’s innocence.’
But Webb argued that the state Supreme Court misinterpreted the law, and said their ruling had ‘upended long-standing Illinois precedent.’
He noted that the court ‘did not find any error with the overwhelming evidence presented at trial’, and that Smollett ‘did not even challenge the sufficiency of the evidence against him in his appeal.’
In particular, he claimed that when Smollett’s case was first dismissed, it was ‘via a nolle prosequi, which does not bar re-prosecution under Illinois law.’
Webb’s statement cast doubt on the court’s approach to its rulings, which came at the end of Smollett’s long and twisting legal saga that began over five years ago.
Smollett was convicted in December 2021 for lying to police about an alleged episode in Chicago two years before, where he claimed two men beat him, yelled homophobic slurs and placed a noose around his neck while wearing MAGA hats.
He was sentenced to 150 days in jail and 30 months’ probation after it was proven that he made the episode up, and he was also slapped with a hefty fine of $130,160.
Smollett appealed the ruling and has not yet served a day of that sentence behind bars, even after his conviction was previously affirmed by a lower court in 2023 before the Supreme Court agreed to hear his appeal.
When the Illinois Supreme Court handed down the ruling to overturn that conviction on Thursday, Chief Justice Theis and Justice Cunningham recused themselves from the decision. The brief did not explain why.
The court’s opinion pointed to the agreement Smollett had with Illinois prosecutors after his charges were dropped.
‘We are aware that this case has generated significant public interest and that many people were dissatisfied with the resolution of the original case and believed it to be unjust,’ the opinion read.
‘Nevertheless, what would be more unjust than the resolution of any one criminal case would be a holding from this court that the State was not bound to honor agreements upon which people have detrimentally relied.’
The actor’s hoax and subsequent arrest sparked a media firestorm years ago, as it was found that he had actually paid two Nigerian brothers – Abel and Ola Osundairo – to stage the incident.
When Smollett first came forward with his story, the actor was met with widespread support, and the Chicago PD vowed to swiftly find his attackers. Smollett even showed police the noose that he claimed he was almost lynched with.
{snip}
