Supreme Court to hear challenge to Colorado’s counseling censorship law

CV NEWS FEED // The U.S. Supreme Court agreed March 10 to hear Chiles v. Salazar, a case that will determine whether Colorado can compel counselors to promote gender transitions while censoring other viewpoints.

Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor, is challenging the law with the support of attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). According to ADF, many of Chiles’ clients seek her counseling because they share her Christian beliefs and want guidance that aligns with their faith. 

However, Colorado law prohibits Chiles from offering that perspective, barring any conversation that encourages minors to accept their biological sex while allowing — and even expecting — counselors to affirm gender transitions.

Under the Colorado law, licensed counselors are prohibited from having any discussion with minors that “attempts or purports to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.” The law imposes serious penalties, including suspension or revocation of a counselor’s license, for those who do not comply.

ADF attorneys contend that Colorado’s law infringes on Chiles’ First Amendment rights by controlling the content of her discussions with clients, effectively imposing government censorship.

“There is a growing consensus around the world that adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria need love and an opportunity to talk through their struggles and feelings,” ADF CEO and General Counsel Kristen Waggoner said. “Colorado’s law prohibits what’s best for these children and sends a clear message: the only option for children struggling with these issues is to give them dangerous and experimental drugs and surgery that will make them lifelong patients.”

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld the law, ADF petitioned the Supreme Court in November. With the high court now set to hear the case, the outcome could have significant implications for free speech and counseling practices nationwide.